27

Geez...we females are even underrepresented as a demographic in urban horticulture...at least when it comes to sexual diversity in planting trees.

An Atlas Obscura article (link below), orginally published in 2019 and titled "Botanical Sexism," * discusses the efforts of Tom Ogren, a horticulturist, to publicize the fact that, in the United States, almost all sexually dimorphic trees planted in urban settings are male, which has caused an overabundance of pollen....and, an overabundance of problems for humans subject to pollen allergies.

Ogren calls this phenomona "Botanical Sexism," although other horticuluralists disagree with the label, claiming that it trivializes the problems women face. Frankly, I like the label: it draws attention to the possibility of everyday male sexism, a sexism that relentlessly (and, sometimes, unconsciously) seems to create a heirarchy in which males always come out on top, or even create a female-free world in which males alone exist...in complete self-sufficiency.

Didn't know whether to post this in the Gardening Circle...or the Women's Heath Lounge Circle...or, of course, in Gender Critical (but, I get tired of posting in gender critical...I'm always posting there, and sometimes need a break).

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/seasonal-allergies-blame-male-trees?utm_source=Atlas+Obscura+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=96f4cab8ea-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_04_05&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_f36db9c480-96f4cab8ea-72883617&mc_cid=96f4cab8ea&mc_eid=4543485c14

*Atlas Obscura seems to be displaying a little "Terfiness" here...asserting an understanding that the sexual binary is real (at least among some, but not all trees), and that this understanding might be important to human health.

Geez...we females are even underrepresented as a demographic in urban horticulture...at least when it comes to sexual diversity in planting trees. An Atlas Obscura article (link below), orginally published in 2019 and titled "Botanical Sexism," * discusses the efforts of Tom Ogren, a horticulturist, to publicize the fact that, in the United States, almost all sexually dimorphic trees planted in urban settings are male, which has caused an overabundance of pollen....and, an overabundance of problems for humans subject to pollen allergies. Ogren calls this phenomona "Botanical Sexism," although other horticuluralists disagree with the label, claiming that it trivializes the problems women face. Frankly, I like the label: it draws attention to the possibility of everyday male sexism, a sexism that relentlessly (and, sometimes, unconsciously) seems to create a heirarchy in which males always come out on top, or even create a female-free world in which males alone exist...in complete self-sufficiency. Didn't know whether to post this in the Gardening Circle...or the Women's Heath Lounge Circle...or, of course, in Gender Critical (but, I get tired of posting in gender critical...I'm always posting there, and sometimes need a break). https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/seasonal-allergies-blame-male-trees?utm_source=Atlas+Obscura+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=96f4cab8ea-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_04_05&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_f36db9c480-96f4cab8ea-72883617&mc_cid=96f4cab8ea&mc_eid=4543485c14 *Atlas Obscura seems to be displaying a little "Terfiness" here...asserting an understanding that the sexual binary is real (at least among some, but not all trees), and that this understanding might be important to human health.

11 comments

[–] Avadavat [OP] 11 points (+11|-0)

The author of the article makes the case that if the tables were turned...if ONLY female trees were planted, NEITHER foul smelling fruit nor allergy-producing pollen would be a problem...as there would be no male trees to fertilize the female trees.

[–] LepistaNuda 4 points (+4|-0)

I just scanned the article and missed that...it makes some sense, although they would have to make sure they got rid of every male in a certain wide area which might a bit difficult but could be done.