OK. This is kind of a ramble, but I hope people can follow me.
I know the general consensus is that the Democratic Party is for abortion rights for women. However, I tend to think this will not be the case in the future. They are fully vested in the trans agenda, probably because they've received so much funding from TECH companies, wealthy TIMs and other vested interests in transhumanism.
My thought is this. Consider how trans activists want to eradicate the concept of women in terms of childbirth/pregnancy. They want to obscure the reality of pregnancy, the oppression of childbirth/motherhood via identifying us as "birthing bodies", erasing the term "woman" from healthcare organizations, from medical research, etc.. They are dismissing the reality of pregnancy for us. They don't believe it's a burden to us, as most men generally dismiss the hardships concerning pregnancy. Whether one can carry a pregnancy (or not) is an "irrelevant issue" in terms of gender identity, according to trans activists.
Trans activists also want to eradicate the concept of sex. They want men to be able to ID as women whenever they see fit-- there are no physical criterion needed for a man to ID as a woman according to them.
Well, if a woman is with a male partner, and becomes pregnant and decides she wants to terminate, what is there to stop him from IDing as a woman? If he IDs as a woman, what's to stop him from legally fighting his pregnant partner's attempt to obtain an abortion? If he is legally a woman (simply because he feels that he is and the law supports TRA ideology), he could argue that to abort the pregnancy would be "against his will" as a woman. The now identified TIM could claim this was a "forced abortion". Remember, they don't identify pregnancy as a real thing... they dismiss the hardships we experience during pregnancy. It would also be against the law to force a "woman" to have an abortion, regardless of whether the woman is a TIM, if what trans activists WANT comes to pass and the capacity to carry a pregnancy to term becomes irrelevant in terms of identity.
Conversely, one could argue that a TIM could fight a female partner carrying a pregnancy to term... as forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy to term isn't completely legal, either... if the TIM identifies as a "woman", the TIM could possibly argue that the pregnancy was against their will... this could lead to the actual pregnant woman either being compelled to abort, or to legally allow the TIM to dodge child support (as the TIM identifies as a "she", and "she" didn't really want the pregnancy in the first place).
How does one legally define the pregnant person if SEX is eradicated in law, and one can ID as any gender at any time? How does one identify a pregnant person legally if the concept of pregnancy is dismissed as "no big deal/not related to biological sex"? This opens up the Pandoras Box to allow the person who is NOT pregnant to decide the fate of the "birthing body".
This might sound like lunacy, but consider how men often transition when their partners are pregnant and/or have just given birth. Read some "trans widows" stories if you don't believe me. Some of these men are clearly emotionally abusive, and I could easily see one actually waging a legal battle in regards to this, if only to control his partner.
Edit: I should add, this would potentially be devastating in the near future as our Supreme Court is conservative. Conservatives will vote pro-life/ pro-men's rights regardless of whether its a TIM fighting for their "right" to bar a woman from terminating a pregnancy.