68

41 comments

[–] [Deleted] 34 points Edited

It's locked to prevent vandalism 🔐🔒

Ew!!!!! Why do the words "transwomen" and "gender identity" appear?!

Unsurprisingly, there's a squabble on the Talk page as to whether the citations for "Adult Human Female" are credible or not

Ah yes, wikipedia, the great bastion of truth, where 91% of edits are done by men.

Did I miss something? Maybe it was edited already by the time I got here, but it says "A woman is an adult female human." which is correct.

[–] bellatrixbells BoobatrixRex 25 points

LOL Look up "trans woman". Last time I went it said "a trans woman is a woman who has incorrectly been assigned male at birth".

That's a lot of words to say "a man who thinks he's a woman".

they really want to change the meaning of words. So apparently we are who we are because a random doctor blessed us with "assigning" our sex?

[–] [Deleted] 22 points Edited

Can somebody with an account just remove this paragraph altogether and ban the person/brigade who wrote it for spreading misinformation/lies to children and people the world over?

Trans women have a male sex assignment at birth that does not align with their gender identity,[3] while intersex women were born with sex characteristics that do not fit typical notions of female biology

"... do not fit typical notions of female biology" I love how they tried to make it sound similar to the trans women definition. Never in my life I have heard "notions" to describe scientific facts.

Update: So I went ahead to search the definition and I found " do not fit the typical definitions for male or female bodies". So yeah the word notion was made up probably by a TIM, how are people like this allowed to edit wikipedia just like that

I feel like a script highlighting how astronomically stupid this is would be perfect as a Risitas meme. I'm chuckling already.

Why the tell are TIMs even mentioned?

[–] hmimperialtortie AGP = evil 14 points

Because Wikipedia is swarming with them, from what I’ve heard, like most tech companies.

Loving the illustration of a welder 👩‍🏭 as the epitome of womanhood. Good work everyone.

Wow, that made my day to see!!! Very surprised TRAs haven’t ruined it.

they have, it's one paragraph hidden in there, see my comment above

I don’t count one paragraph at the very bottom as ruining it. The majority of it says that women are female. With how Wikipedia usually is, I’m pleasantly surprised that it doesn’t make womanhood strictly about gEnDeR iDeNtItY and stereotypes.

Load more (4 comments)