118

There is the idea that the school in Canada with the shop teacher is following the law, they have no choice, huge breast prosthesis falls under "gender expression."

No, it doesn't. The reason is, the breast prosthesis is made for the sole purpose of enhancing a sexual experience. It has no other purpose! It is a sex toy!

Sex toys are not allowed in schools! A teacher cannot bring a sex toy to work, and put it on full display, whether a poster, a worn article, something sitting on a desk.

Get a fucking lawyer on this case that knows what the hell they are talking about. SEX TOY. A WORN SEX TOY. NO.

There is the idea that the school in Canada with the shop teacher is following the law, they have no choice, huge breast prosthesis falls under "gender expression." No, it doesn't. The reason is, the breast prosthesis is made for the sole purpose of enhancing a sexual experience. It has no other purpose! It is a sex toy! Sex toys are not allowed in schools! A teacher cannot bring a sex toy to work, and put it on full display, whether a poster, a worn article, something sitting on a desk. Get a fucking lawyer on this case that knows what the hell they are talking about. SEX TOY. A WORN SEX TOY. NO.

45 comments

If you admit that the breasts are a sex toy, you have no choice but to admit that the whole thing is a fetish.

That's the legal case right there. If I was school board, I'd ask for the receipt, as to where he purchased it. Shazam!

This is exactly what needs to be done. I’ve been waiting for someone to find it post the website and product description online. I can’t image that there are more than a handful of companies that sell a product like that.

I’ve thought about looking for it myself but I’m kind of scared of what I might find lol.

You can buy them on Amazon (NSFL)... interestingly the nipples are covered up in their photos, presumably even the degenerates who make and sell these things realise that would be crossing a line.

[–] SlowCollapse 36 points Edited

This story can't be allowed to just fade away.

I generally hate cancel culture and can't stand seeing lives destroyed over one act of poor behaviour, but that individual should not be allowed into a school, let alone permitted to teach, with that fetish toy on full display.

If this person is in anywhere near a fit state of mind to be left alone with other people's children as a teacher, it should have been incredibly clear to them that wearing such a thing in the workplace was extremely inappropriate.

I know I keep saying it in every thread about this perverted bridge troll, but I just cannot believe the parents didn't pull their kids from the class. My kid would be sitting in the library for that period or switching to another tech teacher, one

I also can't believe the kids didn't stage a protest. In 7th grade we had this really mean long term substitute. He was like, unreasonably assholish. After weeks of his shit, all of us organized on AOL (I'm dating myself lol) and 99% of the kids who had him staged a walkout. In retrospect it was really metal of us bc we were really quiet when we left, and we had a letter I gave to him as we walked out, and a letter for the principal.

It wasn't the first letter we'd written, we did a petition to get him fired first, but they ignored it so we had to step our game up

I also can't believe the kids didn't stage a protest.

Well, it'd be funny if they all turned up to class with large fake boobs or massive crotch bulges. But I expect that they'd be suspended/expelled for it...

[–] immersang ★♫☆❉★♬☆ 1 points

Ah, your story just made me think back to my school days. Not sure if it's that way everywhere else, but in Germany teachers basically have to do a traineeship at a school after they have finished university. Only after finishing that they have officially finished their training and can start working as actual teachers. And during that time, they will get multiple visits from people from the school board who observe and assess their teaching.

So, most of those trainee teachers know that it's beneficial to them to have a good relationship with the classes they teach.

Because otherwise, what might happen is this: There was one trainee teacher one year who was, as you put it, unreasonably assholish. I had him in PE at the time and he was horrible. Seemed to get off on perceived "power" he had over students. Well, he also taught something else....a language, if I remember correctly....to a different class. And so when the school board people showed, the students in that class just did not willingly participate and pretended to not know the answers to anything. He did not have a good time during that particular assessment.

(The students could really make or break those assessments. One year, I had a trainee teacher in my English class. And we all loved him, he was a great teacher, just super nervous when the assessment came up. So we made extra sure to participate well and prepare in advance.)

agree that its a sex toy.

if any women with large breasts on their staff went braless in super tight tops they would be reprimanded immediately. its more sexism. anyone with a brain would see that it shows they don't really think trans women are women, because no one considers women dressing in an overtly sexual manner at our work place (assuming its not a brothel or similar.....) as an expression of their gender identity.

actually would be willing to donate to the cost of buying these for the female staff of this school just to see what happens.

But it's the same if a male teacher wore thin, sort of sheer pants, light colored, and his erect penis and balls were visible to one and all.

I don't think a female teacher would go braless in a super tight top in a high school because SHE doesn't want to deal with the harassment and ridicule of her students and male staff, regardless of breast size. If women don't want their nipples visible, it's because of the harassment that would be directed at them, not the other way around.

Female staff wearing the breast prosthesis? I guarantee students would be taking her picture and posting to porn sites, for the sexual gratification of men around the world. I guarantee "teacher hentai breasts" would become a brand new porn category. Is this guy's pic being posted to porn sites? Good, more evidence for the legal case.

The only reason a female teacher would be wearing a breast prosthesis to school is if she'd had a mastectomy. You can buy them at specialty stores (I've read about TiMs scheduling fittings at these stores 🤢). But he didn't do that. He went out of his way to find a cartoonish sex toy.

A female teacher would be trying to avoid attention, this pervert is desperate for it.

I just read this quote in the book Trans by Helen Joyce:

‘Forced feminisation’ – someone making a man cross-dress or undergo sex-reassignment surgery – is a staple of transgender erotica. Quite a few of Lawrence’s informants say they would find it shameful to be a woman, and that this turns them on. ‘Experiencing the daily humiliation and degradation of being a woman, forced to wear women’s clothes and lipstick, is extremely attractive to me,’ writes one.

This fake tittied douchebag is absolutely getting off to this, probably transturbating in the bathroom between classes

Yes, I agree with you completely. Imagine how a teacher might feel, who's had a mastectomy, and this jerk comes in dressed the way he is!

My mother actually has a few sets of these. It's horrifying.

Breasts are not genitals.

I agree it is very inappropriate. But breasts=genitals is the argument men use to forbid women nursing in public.

Women don't breastfeed in public for the sexual arousal of others. This man is wearing silicon breasts with fake erect nipples that he bought off some website for crossdressers.

It would be an entirely different scenario if he WAS wearing a bra and the nipples weren't visible. Picture that in your mind. Many women have large breasts, they just look like a "shelf" inside of a bra, a shape, or "bosom," not with perfectly delineated erect nipples.

It isn’t the same!! At all!!!

Breasts != dick

There is no history of horrible disgusting subhuman violence committed with breasts as the weapon. Breasts sometimes need to be visible to FEED CHILDREN. Breasts are useful, penises are at best a nuisance except in very very very rare circumstances where they may be enjoyable for a woman.

Let’s kill this comparison.

[–] Dee 15 points

These things aren't breasts, and that guy is a dick.

Let's not kill it. It's a useful analogy. Dick and balls aren't to be paraded around in workplaces, and neither are erect nipples on display through sheer clothing.

Thank you! That gross comparison has been pretty much every other comment about this dude I've seen all over the place and it's really not helpful.

I guarantee "teacher hentai breasts" would become a brand new porn category.

i really wish you weren't right, but i think you are. i was just trying to think of a protest that would show the hypocrisy, evidently need to get back to the drawing board.

The problem is these people probably also view the natural female body as a sex toy

No, this is a school and there are policies in place regarding sexualized behavior of any kind in the school setting. From a legal standpoint, the breast prosthesis is something purchased in a certain venue for the purpose of enhancing a sexual experience. WOMEN do not purchase this item to wear to work as a fashion accessory. The Ontario Human Rights Commission has a section on sexual abuse, and there are relevant definitions of sexual harassment:

requiring an employee to dress in a sexualized or gender-specific way[32]

Translate that to: Requiring students and staff to VIEW an employee [teacher] dressed in a sexualized way;

propositions of physical intimacy

Translation: Very large nipples visible through sheer clothing

displaying or circulating pornography,[27] sexual pictures or cartoons,[28] sexually explicit graffiti,[29] or other sexual images (including online)

Breast prosthesis MARKETED AS sex toy, or hentai-related, or whatever the ad said certainly falls under this category. It may be a "novel interpretation" but the evidence is there that he did NOT buy a bra at a store that women wear, and donned that (like many TIMs do), he bought an item created and marketed and used as a sex toy. End of.

Lawyers are going to hit on this eventually.

I really hope you're right about lawyers getting involved but I'm not holding my breath. This school is beyond woke, they're not just woke, they are actively slamming 8 balls of Wokium into their arms

If TIMs try to use breast cancer survivors as a pawn to that, how should we respond?

Does the law provide limits to the size of breast forms, like "over this size = fetish?"

I've been in shops that sell bras and breast prostheses for women after mastectomies. There aren't erect nipples on those prostheses, as far as I've seen, and they don't come in such an outlier of a size.

[–] furyosa no, thank you 2 points

I'll give it a try: Since women already engage in breast enlargment, and even though it's not entirely uncontroversial, I've never seen it framed as a fetish if you are enlarging already existing/having had those existing body part(s). Breast enlargment in women have more been framed as making up for an insecurity.

i want a TIF to wear a fully erect strap under really tight pants and see how that's treated...

That's not going to happen, because TIFs don't transition due to AGP. At least that's my understanding, correct me if I'm wrong.

not AGP, but AAP is a thing. just much less common since women aren't usually as pornsick as men