109

82 comments

She is making the other 99% of - totally well kept - transgender individuals look bad. Though we should also try to separate her from that group overall. The title should really be “teacher wears giant prosthetic breasts”. Transgender or not that’s the story here. If my teacher showed up like that, Id be put off. It’s distracting. Yes it’s unprofessional — you can even see her nipples! Never mind that it’s in a trade class where it’s somewhat of a hazard. Just my $0.02

Absolutely NOT! You don’t get to change the rules when it suits you. That pervert is using YOUR gender expression and identity laws to get away with a sex crime. It is central to the story of WHY he is able to not only get away with it but continue doing it.

you can even see her nipples!

THOSE ARE NOT "HER" NIPPLES!! Those are not even nipples! Unbelievable

Exactly. Not nipples. Not breasts.

Not a woman. What's with all the she-ing and her-ing in that thread?!

If they can't even renounce this man and call him "he", we can only conclude that they condone this.

My thoughts exactly. Don't call him trans, but continue to use female pronouns. 🙄🥱

If they can't even renounce this man and call him "he", we can only conclude that they condone this.

Yep. Even if they concede that this pervert shouldn't be a teacher, they still want him to have unfettered access to women’s intimate spaces (including ones his female students use)

That comment is ridiculous. First off, no real woman would go to her schoolteacher job (or any job, for that matter) wearing giant fake hentai tits. Second, a real woman would NEVER get away with this shit if she did try it! Female teachers have been fired because some scrote dug up nudes or porn she did decades ago under a different name. But a man gets away with parading sex toys around in front of students because it "affirms his gender".

This is EXACTLY what happens when men are allowed to define what a woman is!!!!

No way it’s only 1% but simultaneously, how refreshing that a TIM is admitting that even 1% of them are lying pervs.

Also, the trans part is relevant because “cis” women and men simply do not do this shit.

I’m blown away at the amount of cruelty the trans community is directing at him, what makes them think the rest of us don’t see them the same way they see him?

Clowns.

[–] Calliope 21 points Edited

Transgender or not that’s the story here.

Yeah, I agree with you. Transgender is the story here whether the gendie fanatics want to accept it or not.

Load more (1 comment)
[–] kayfabe 73 points Edited

Omg the apologists are DESPERATELY trying to make this okay and I’m cracking up at their methods:

“See, THIS woman also has giant boobs and no one’s going after her!” (links to image of female pornography performer as if that’s the same as wearing that prosthetic to teach children)

or

“I’m gonna show up with a coke can prosthetic dick and teach preschool!”

“The worlds largest dick is 18 inches, are you saying it should be ILLEGAL to teach preschool if you have a dick??”. Missing the mark there, bro.

It’s so fucking brain dead, I just can’t, lol.

[–] MenHaveItEasy Moid Respecter 18 points

That last reply is so fucking Darvo. Does this TIM need to wear sex toy prostetics with an 18 inch circumference?

Even if a man wanted to wear prosthetics to replace his missing dick and balls, he wouldn't think of it as an opportunity to wear an 18 inch packer and show it off to children.

These coomers can't see past their own fetish to understand why someone would want to wear this fetish gear to protest the ridiculousness of the law that protects these perverts.

The worlds largest dick is 18 inches, are you saying it should be ILLEGAL to teach preschool if you have a dick??

Do the US have a law about forbidden behavior if it creates scandal? I'm pretty sure in Italy it would be illegal because if you can't hide a ginormous dick you can't teach children. They could see its outline and is unfair.

They would just make you wear pants that don't show off your enormous dick.

I am sure that a man with this problem would probably feel somewhat similar to how women with very large breasts feel, and do his best not to draw attention at his job. Although men are gross so maybe not IDK

I can't even imagine that being a problem. I assume the dick is only that big when it's hard. It's honestly not difficult for a man to dress appropriately without showing off his dick

Actually, if the boobs or the dick were real, American disability law would likely come into play. Accommodation would need to be made, but there's a sort of "separate but equal" clause - like you could teach, but maybe they'd make you teach the highest grade you qualify for and not preschool.

Now fetish wear is something not really judicated (yet). Largely because many places have stricter dress codes for k-12 teachers, IME.

A reasonable accommodation is more likely to be "wear baggy pants" rather than not letting him teach any particular grade TBH

"The worlds largest dick is 18 inches, are you saying it should be ILLEGAL to teach preschool if you have a dick??”. Missing the mark there, bro.

Honestly, I wouldn't feel safe dropping my kid at a preschool with men in charge

I love how there are both comments saying "this person is a false flag from the right. NO ONE on the left is defending them. we shouldn't talk about this and give the right ammo" AND comments saying "there are cis women with giant breasts too. would you punish them? stop policing gender."

So which is it? False flag? Or valid gender expression?

Sometimes I read something so heinously bad that I start to think along that same logic. "Yeah, that person is absolutely an astroturfed account trying to make the gender cult look worse than it already is."

Then I look a little deeper, and it's always, always just some dumb ass incel being sincere and terminally online. Turns out you don't need to do anything to make the transgender community look bad. They do that legwork for you.

"there are cis women with giant breasts too. would you punish them? stop policing gender."

It's almost as if they have zero insight into what it's like to be female, and didn't know that it's very common for women with large breasts to agonize over which tops and dresses provide the most coverage.

Its almost as if they have zero insight into what it's like to be female, and didn't know that it's very common for women with large breasts to agonize over which tops and dresses provide the most coverage.

Not to mention the fact that, if a real woman had breasts that large, she'd likely be too disabled to work.

Yes! This particular example of woman-face is offensive in so many ways.

I've seen it happen so many times over the years at work that women with large breasts are criticized and judged for what tops they wear. No matter how professional and modest the shirt is they're told it's inappropriate unless they wear an extremely baggy ugly top, for which they're immediately labeled as disheveled and unkempt. The sexualization of breasts by society/men is disgusting.

I used to watch a lot of What Not to Wear. There were so many women the hosts told to "go to a bra fitter" or "get your clothes tailored", as if that's a reasonable, affordable option for most women. I do wish that schools taught sewing, and other technical skills. But I just hate how girls and women have to plan their outfits around men's lasciviousness.

It's also frustrating how hard it can be to find women's clothes that aren't cut extremely low.

And the choice between looking like a frumpy matron or a whore

[–] Dee 22 points

Yeah, no. If you believe that "people are who they say they are", then that applies to everyone, or you prove that you don't truly believe your own nonsense.

Bingo.

These types of contradictions are EVERYWHERE. The whole movement is an incoherent mess.

"this person is a false flag from the right. NO ONE on the left is defending them. we shouldn't talk about this and give the right ammo"

Sure, no one except the gat dang school district… I love it when they say such demonstrably false things.

stop policing gender

Lol, no, because not “policing gender” is exactly why this guy can’t be fired now. Be careful what you wish for, TRAs, because you’ll end up with him. He’s 100% their fault lol

Lol the problem is that it's impossible to tell at this point 🤪 What a world.

Because we’re meant to substitute a person’s subjective feelings (usually a creepy, weird person at that) over anything to do with reality.

If your definition of a transwoman (and thus a woman) is literally “anyone who says she’s a woman,” then we end up in this through the looking glass situation.

This sparks so much joy.

Somewhat related, I was browsing /lgbt/ on 4chan the other day and there was a really active thread about this dude with a bunch of extremely concerned TIM comments.

Just like with the pee protest, they're trying to claim that this dude was hired to make TIMs look bad and is totally not actually representative of the community!

Same is happening on other forums. Mostly denial and/or No True Scotsman. On this thread, I only saw one comment that really got to the crux of it (emphasis mine):

Here's the problem: what is it about what this person doing that actually makes this less Valid™ than anything else? Like it's easy to call this person a pervert or a fetishist doing it for a sexual thrill rather than a legitimate point of identity, but thus far there isn't even actually any hard proof of it being sexual, let alone not legitimate identity.... So how do you actually know this isn't legitimate? Like the whole thing is basically just Chris Chan's pronouns all over again... **what's really at stake here is not the legitimacy of the individual person in question: it's about the legitimacy of the entire trans ideological edifice nowadays being built around people not being allowed to question anything. ** That's why the other common response here is denial, either trying to downplay how ridiculous this is, or even thinking this is a psyop/rightoid stunt. The conundrum is, if you're allowed to question and doubt this, what ELSE are you allowed to question or doubt? Where exactly is the line? And that's not a question that people want to deal with, hence the denialism.

They will go through the most insane mental gymnastics rather than admit that their ranks include creeps and nutcases, and police themselves.

Too bad for them. There are videos of him walking with those ridiculous things dated from a year ago.

is totally not actually representative of the community!

Yup, it's no true ScotsTIM. happens every time

[–] wildwitch 18 points Edited

"He's not really trans!! This isn't even a trans issue!"

They squawk.

This man is allowed to get undressed in public gym locker rooms where women and children get changed.

This man can enter women's shelters and predate on vulnerable women if he so desires.

It doesn't matter if he's "real" or if any "trans person" is. ALL predators and fetishists are protected because of "trans rights" laws.

The children in this school cannot consent to this. Women do not consent to this.

We cannot protect any vulnerable members of society as long as we let any foxes into the hen house.

Also: how DARE any of these TRAs call this instance a "costume" or a "characature of the female body" as I've seen it described in that thread.

Any attempt to wear our skin and claim our identity and our oppression is insulting, sexist characature--you don't get to decide that it only becomes that at some imaginary line.

Also, if he isn't trans, why aren't TRAs demand the school fire him? They could even argue that he's being a bigot.

This story is bringing out the narcissist’s prayer in full force, at least the first half of it.

That didn't happen. (It’s a hoax, false flag, misinformation, etc.) And if it did, it wasn't that bad. (Women do have big boobs, you know) And if it was, that's not a big deal. (Isolated case, nothing to see here, nothing to see.)

It will be interesting to see what developments prompts the second half of the prayer to come out.

The worst part is the school board blind response. Its now at a level that if you contact them through email they have a standard auto reply about respecting rights and inclusion. I even tried calling their number, would put you on hold and disconnect in 5 mins. The school board should be held responsible for letting this go the wrong way. There is a very clear misjudgment on what inclusion and respect of rights is about.

The school board is absolutely brain dead.

At this point, seems to be on par with literally every school admin around the world. Hopped up on their own power and a complete lack of understanding of both students and classrooms, these people only care about making money and satisfying their lobbyists- Sacrificing both students and teachers in the process. Administration will be the death of our school systems

[–] Kevina 17 points Edited

This is what happens when you codify things in law that no one can define, or that have no basis in reality. Like "trans" or "gender expression". This man isnt a woman, which is why you cant impose female dress code standards on him, so what to do?

This was the inevitable end to all of this, but hopefully this will snap some people back to reality? I mean, I express my gender by snorting coke off the desk while shoving a finger up my ass. That's protected too right?

[–] Raea 23 points

haaaaahaha! somewhere way down in my comments scroll I saw a bloke remark that he knows women with "anime tiddies" that big.

because I know all of these losers come here to see what we have to say, I just want to let that young man know that it's a given if you use the term "tiddies" you don't actually know any women.

for real, everyone knows you don't know any women.

You don't even need to know any women personally, just go walk down the street and let me know when you see a real woman with breasts like that

And if a woman was built like that, she wouldn't dress as this freak does.

I remember there was one niche porn star yeeears ago with giant surgical gag boobs, l don’t think hers were even that big.

haaaaahaha! somewhere way down in my comments scroll I saw a bloke remark that he knows women with "anime tiddies" that big.

By "knows women" he means: "I see lots of big titties in porn/hentai/OnlyFans. So that means its normal for actual women to have hindenberg boobs!"

"yeah, I do! I know women. I know lots of women. like I've seen magazines with women. and I've heard of women. are they nice?"

lolol

"I talk to women. I say "hi" to my mom when she brings me hot pockets!"

[–] TransWidow Memoir Oct 16! 11 points

I see way too many comments there calling the dude "she" or otherwise pretending there are parallels to other totally normal situations. Goes to show you how far people will go to keep from amending any of the terrible ideas they accidentally defended in the past.

Well, the comments sexing him correctly are removed

[–] vulvapeople 2 points Edited

That's why I prefer not to use pronouns for these clowns at all, unless I'm commenting here of course. I've been dragging this guy on Twitter for the past few days and haven't "misgendered" him once.

Load more (7 comments)