Mermaids are also problematic from the waist down, so a double tell, uncanny creatures with siren like proclivities and no genitalia. It does make you wonder when you think about it.
Even more if you consider the theory that all of these “trans” children who will never develop properly physically or sexually or emotionally are being created ultimately to be fed to pedophiles. A child that has been rendered sterile and incapable of sexual pleasure via puberty blockers, wrong sex hormones and possibly SRS is a mermaid, alluring to pedophiles but essentially desexed. The name choice of this so called charity is incredibly telling and horrifying.
I was just thinking yesterday about how creepy the name "Mermaids" is, in itself. I've felt that way since I first learned of the charity, when I was a child.
Mermaids are beloved of many children, it's true. But think about what a mermaid is, for a second.
A mermaid is fish woman, usually naked or nearly so, who lures sailors to their death by seducing them. It's an inherently sexual creature.
I always felt a bit creeped out by the choice of name for an organization promoting transsexual children (primarily little boys who "become women.") If they wanted to name it something cute and "girly," they could have called it "Butterflies" or "Unicorns" or "Pixies" or anything else, and it would have sounded a lot more innocent. But they really seem to love the idea of little boys transforming into voluptuous, sexually available women. It's like the stuff Genevieve Gluck has been whistle blowing about, from the "Eunuch Archive."