Been ruminating on how gay rights has had the consequence of exploding the surrogacy market.
I have absolutely no objections to a gay male couple having children through fostering or even adoption in ethical situations but that isn't what most of them want.
It is so frustrating that as soon as they've got what they want they turn against women and use us just like straight men would.
That got me thinking about how a lot of arguments against puberty blockers involve pointing out that they kill the fertility of all the future lesbians and gay men, which is true and horrific, but I've hit a snag and realised that I don't care about gay men's fertility.
PBs are horrific for a long list of other reasons that should suffice but my two principles of, gay boys shouldn't be sterilized and that surrogacy for gay men to have bio-children is just a 10 month prostitution contract are now in conflict.
Perhaps it's just the common thing of a realisation of a new principal is always a bit harsh but gay men should not have biological children so the effect of PBs causing infertility in them is of no concern to me.
Sorry for the long rant, just wondering what others think.