129

After the Club Q shooter was revealed to be nonbinary, the usual suspects on TIM activist twitter have been screeching about it all day, and it's SO fucking incredible to watch how their desperate arguments are immediately negated by their OWN ideology.

"Why would a trans person attack a queer bar?" Why do so many transwomen kill women, then, if being part of a group should automatically include not killing people of that same group?

"He's just identifying as NB for less serious charges!" Oh but I thought that it was impossible and "never happens" that anyone would identify as trans for a lighter sentence. Don't y'all argue that trans people are MORE persecuted in law? Why would NB grant him privilege if you don't admit that trans people are a protected caste?

"It's suspicious that this only came out after the shooting!" But we're not allowed to question the hundreds of transwomen who miraculously discover their gender identity after being charged with crimes?

"He was identifying as a man two years ago!" And Dylan Mulvaney was a man 200 years ago. Does that mean he's not valid?

And all of their arguments can simply be shut down by their own beloved mantra: "trans people are who they say they are."

We're only following the rules YOU have set out. In accordance with your ideology his gender identity must be respected no matter his crime, misgendering him is just as bad as the crime, and his self identity is 100% valid regardless of literally anything.

The schadenfreude watching them have to face the inanity and illogic of their own ideology is delicious.

After the Club Q shooter was revealed to be nonbinary, the usual suspects on TIM activist twitter have been screeching about it all day, and it's SO fucking incredible to watch how their desperate arguments are immediately negated by their OWN ideology. "Why would a trans person attack a queer bar?" Why do so many transwomen kill women, then, if being part of a group should automatically include not killing people of that same group? "He's just identifying as NB for less serious charges!" Oh but I thought that it was impossible and "never happens" that anyone would identify as trans for a lighter sentence. Don't y'all argue that trans people are MORE persecuted in law? Why would NB grant him privilege if you don't admit that trans people are a protected caste? "It's suspicious that this only came out after the shooting!" But we're not allowed to question the hundreds of transwomen who miraculously discover their gender identity after being charged with crimes? "He was identifying as a man two years ago!" And Dylan Mulvaney was a man 200 years ago. Does that mean he's not valid? And all of their arguments can simply be shut down by their own beloved mantra: "trans people are who they say they are." We're only following the rules YOU have set out. In accordance with your ideology his gender identity must be respected no matter his crime, misgendering him is just as bad as the crime, and his self identity is 100% valid regardless of literally anything. The schadenfreude watching them have to face the inanity and illogic of their own ideology is delicious.

80 comments

[–] Xephyrr 1 points Edited

I feel the same way. It makes me so angry anymore when I see it. Not only is it ugly, but the trans part looks extremely out of place and is literally shoving it's way into the LGB part.

Which is pretty accurate, considering how much they've invaded and taken over every single aspect of the LGB community and make every single thing about themselves. Fuck the rest of the LGB and fuck their same-sex attraction. They want to burn all the progress we've made to the ground to get what they want and don't give a fuck who they hurt. LGB rights are going to slide backwards because of these fucking narcissists because they force-team with us, using us as a shield for their disgusting bullshit.

They're like dingleberries clutching where they aren't wanted. No matter how hard we wipe we can't we can't seem to get the shit off.

Exactly. It’s a stupid flag. First and foremost, the black and brown...skin colour has literally nothing to do with sexual orientation, not one thing.

And then the ugly, nasty trans bit literally eating away at the LGB rainbow...which as you say, is accurate 😒 made up “gender identity” is not a sexual orientation and never will be.

Yeah...the black and brown is so bizarre because like you said, it has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Of course there are LGB people who aren't white. Why does it need to be slapped onto the flag like an afterthought? It's just tacky and performative virtue signaling. Most POC I know hate it and think it's ugly, too.

Precisely! Sure, many LGBs are black/brown/mixed race but many LGBs are tall, short, blonde, parents, fat, thin, elderly, teenagers, deaf, blind, multi lingual, in wheelchairs, double jointed, left handed, religious...and the list could go on.

LGBs are just people, and people come in too many varieties to cram onto an ugly and pointless flag. It is just empty virtue signalling. The T doesn’t belong with the LGB, and skin colour has no more to do with sexual orientation than any of those characteristics listed above.