81

Their aim is to turn every hard-won single-sexed space into a mixed-sex space. Women's sports, women's rape refuges, change rooms, breastfeeding support groups, single-sex health care, everything thing we have fought for DECADES to carve out for ourselves.

Having to genuflect and pretend that TIMs are women is part of getting society to widely accept a legal fiction so it will be adopted into the legal system and used in lawfare against women.

They want women to be prosecuted and punished for trying to carve out spaces of their own.

Their aim is to turn every hard-won single-sexed space into a mixed-sex space. Women's sports, women's rape refuges, change rooms, breastfeeding support groups, single-sex health care, everything thing we have fought for DECADES to carve out for ourselves. Having to genuflect and pretend that TIMs are women is part of getting society to widely accept a [legal fiction](https://www.britannica.com/topic/legal-fiction) so it will be adopted into the legal system and used in lawfare against women. They **want** women to be prosecuted and punished for trying to carve out spaces of their own.

31 comments

[–] Chronicity 7 points Edited

I don’t know if that’s their intent but its certainly the logical destination of their demands.

I figured this out when reading Title IX’s proposed rule for redefining sex to include gender identity. Right now, single-sex spaces are permissible for select purposes (like restrooms, sports, etc), but they are not required. The guiding principle for sports is that if there are sports for boys, then girls are entitled to sports too. This principle could be met, in theory, if a school just decided to make all sports co-ed and scrap girl teams altogether.

Under the proposal, schools will have to accommodate all gender identities, including any non-binary identity that an imaginative kid could dream up. The language in the proposed rule makes clear that if there isn’t a program or provision that is consistent with a person’s gender identity, then this is impermissible discrimination. So a school could find itself sued by catgender students if the school provides boy sports and girls sports but not a catgender division. Same with restrooms, locker rooms, etc.

Why would a school take on that litigation risk when it could just do away with all single-sex programs and still be compliant with Title IX? Just make everything sex neutral and the catgender edge lords can no longer cry discrimination. This is where we are headed if this rule is finalized.