More
68

75 comments

[–] vampires_teabag 56 points

Why oh why are all these womens biographies and info about themselves so childish. For someone who is supposedly doing such serious work, ministering to people and supporting families during very uncertain and dark periods, the whole third grade vibe is really offputting. I dont care about your quirky millennial hobbies or twitter debate points, I want to know you can handle sickness, death, grief, hopelessness, enduring suffering, you know, the big existential things. If I was handed a pamphlet about this service, I would immediately question the hospitals judgment, possibly walk out with the tubes still in me lol.

I cant imagine this appealing to anybody except the sassy sticker on your water bottle crowd, can you imagine some regular old working class family, who is falling apart at the seams personally and financially trying to get their kid treatment for something that could kill them, having to put up with this uwu monstrosity. Why should they care about her fiances pronouns, or what fandoms her cat's names come from, or that she likes fucking cheese. Why should her colleagues, who are dealing with the debt of watching useless suffering every day, give a shit that she just wuvvvvvs otters, lol. Is she talking to the kids or grown adults who have hospital jobs???? Does she know the difference? When i see shit like this I see a service provider who needs more from me than I need from her, and I run the other way.
[–] hellamomzilla 41 points

When my child is in a critical health moment and possibly dying, I definitely want a self-centered person who seems to have zero idea that a chaplain is supposed to be there for other people.

It’s horrible.
[–] RawSienna 7 points

It’s so off-putting. There seems to be an entire generation of psychologically stunted adults.

[–] wishforsanity 12 points

Right. Trans stuff aside, you want someone fairly serious for this job. I don't want to hear "Hiiiiiiiiiii! I'm like, soooooooo sorry that your child is super sick, that totally sucks. Do you like cheese? I like cheese!"
[–] pennygadget 2 points

Trans stuff aside, you want someone fairly serious for this job. I don't want to hear "Hiiiiiiiiiii! I'm like, soooooooo sorry that your child is super sick, that totally sucks. Do you like cheese? I like cheese!"

"Terminal leukemia. That's a bummer. Anyway, did I mention that my pet iguana is named after Dr Fauchi? Aren't I quirky? LOL. Let's take some pics for Instagram!!!"
[–] Mobymaybe 14 points

You said exactly what I wanted to say. I work in oncology and our chaplains are there to provide some peace and support to patients and families going through illness. They’re not there to “shake things up” and force pronoun usage on sick pediatric patients. They always go for the most vulnerable, don’t they.

[–] pennygadget 17 points

So true. Her bio looks like something written by a child. Completely unprofessional considering the seriousness of her position

But I admit that I laughed at her admitting that her cat was named after a Harry Potter character. I'm surprised she didn't dedicate a paragraph to apologizing for naming an animal after a book series written by "The Transphobic Nazi Witch". 🤣
[–] BlueToyotaTacoma I post shit 60 points

What’s with the push for all the trans stuff in children’s hospitals?

Wait, I know why.

Pedos.
[–] BondiBlue 37 points

Spiked has an incredibly chilling article about this push to not just normalize pedophilia but make it seem "cool."

https://archive.ph/IYmEB

It's about the Balenciaga scandal (trending as #FashionGate), but deals with this cultural decay and the "q~eering of the last taboo" more generally (see also, that disgusting new play in Chicago aiming to cultivate sympathy for kiddy fiddlers). Particularly relevant in light of the fact we now know that someone involved in that mess published a book about castrating kids, and so did a member of the WPATH board, which jumped the shark advocating for "eunuchs" as a "gender identity."

The decrepit legacy outlets have the nerve to call this QAnon, but more and more signs point to QAnon being an op to discredit outcry over the deep rot of pedophilic tendencies and behaviors being practiced and normalized by the ruling class. Remember their motto: "It's not happening, and it's good that it is, bigot."
[–] Eava 26 points

I found it outrageous that the NYT poo-poohed the concerns over what are things too bizarre to be summarily written off as coincidences. A judicial opinion about child pornography just happens to end up in a photoshoot? I don't think that is something to just accept without question.
[–] BondiBlue 17 points

They are complicit and should be denounced as such. Same with WaPo lending praise to that utter filth of a play, and having the gall to compare it to A Doll's House and the struggle for, of all things, women's rights.

I cannot believe we live in a timeline where outrage about pedophiles is either casually dismissed as a conspiracy theory on par with Martians assassinating JFK, or vigorously slammed as fascist propaganda meant to cause pogroms against an "undeservedly" persecuted minority group. The notion that "kiddy diddler" or "pervert" or the well-known "groomer" is a slur, equivalent or worse than the N word, is simply beyond comprehension.
[–] VestalVirgin 15 points

more and more signs point to QAnon being an op to discredit outcry over the deep rot of pedophilic tendencies and behaviors being practiced and normalized by the ruling class.

You mean, the conspiracy theory has been started by the ruling class?

That makes sense ... I have always wondered why people would make up conspiracy theories about rich people sucking children's blood in the basements of pizza restaurants (or something like that), when sexual abuse of children is very much real and very much a problem, and they could be doing something against that.
[–] Apricot_Ibex LGB Ally 🏳️‍🌈 15 points Edited

The thing is that Q Anon cultists believe that groomers are all liberals, atheists, and gay people (they don’t usually even differentiate gay from trans) , while conservatives do the same thing all the time and always have— the churches are full of it, and they will cover ass for pastors, priests, and predatory politicians because “muh values.” It’s a great distraction tool. They also push for young teen girls to get married and have children as quickly as possible, like “celebrity” conservative groomer families like the Duggars.

Look how many Q Anon supporters believed that the pregnant ten year old who needed an abortion was a “hoax,” a lie perpetuated by conservative congressman Jim Jordan among others. Then they became more outraged that the poor little girl received the abortion than that she was raped, and now they are going after her abortion provider.

And of course on the so-called progressive side, we have the Democratic Party Be Kind idiots embracing the trans Trojan horse that is force-teaming AGP and pedos with LGB human rights. They’ll excuse any predatory male, even child rapists and murderers, as long as he’s a TIM, because not doing so would be Transphobic™️ or they’ll let men openly talk about groomer fetishes and wanting to abuse teenage girls because “kink shaming” is bigoted.

So we have two sides full of predatory males pointing fingers and distracting the public from their own behaviors with this “good vs evil” narrative (as usual) and women are supposed to pick a side and defend the men of that ideology who are “good” when of course there aren’t any.

I wish we could have a Women’s Party that focused solely on women’s and children’s issues.

[–] Eava 5 points

I am pretty convinced that Q is really Jim Watkins and his son Ron, who own and run 8chan. I don't know that they are "elite" Jim is an ex military helicopter repairman who moved to the Philippines where he has a pig farm and other business ventures. I do think QAnon has been manipulated by right wing forces to serve their political interests, but unless Ron Watkins is some sort of deep cover operative, I don't think QAnon started as a tool of the elite.
[–] VestalVirgin 13 points

Yeah, pedos.

The TRAs in the article seem to all be female, but I bet that's just to get a foot in the door.

Pedo males are not going to leave this opportunity to molest defenseless children unused.
[–] pennygadget 8 points

The TRAs in the article seem to all be female, but I bet that's just to get a foot in the door.

Its totally intentional. They use dumb, non-threatening lesbians to get their foot in the door. And then that opens the way for male pedos to be left alone with the sick kids in their hospital beds

Its just like how they normalized TIMs by first introducing us to abused, castrated little boys like Jazz Jennings
[–] pennygadget 6 points

And they're trying to make this insidious trans shit more palatable by making a pair of dopey lesbians the messengers of this new religion
[–] actualdyke 32 points

reminder that pedophilia is the only logical conclusion of trans ideology. if you believe children as young as 2 have the agency to choose their gender, and if you think children as young as 10 can consent to lifelong medical procedures, there's absolutely no argument as to why they cannot consent to sex or 'choose' sex with adults.

[–] BondiBlue 14 points

Pay attention to the concerted push to lower the voting age in various places where this ideology has run rampant. NZ already had a Supreme Court decision declaring 18 as age of majority to be "arbitrary" and unconstitutional, but it would require a majority vote in Parliament to make a lower voting age into law, which the campaign does not yet have the numbers for.

Canada has had no court decisions on the matter that I am aware of, but their parliament recently defeated a bill introduced by the NDP, that in fact mirrored recommendations in a report previously presented to the governing Liberal party, and which remains a consistent plea from the Liberals' youth wing. Nevertheless, Canada had already lowered (or "streamlined") the age of consent for certain sexual acts, and are currently debating whether and/or how to permit "mature minors" to request medically assisted euthanasia.

The U.S. has no bills on the docket that I am aware of, nor court decisions, regarding the lowering of the voting age, which would appear to require a constitutional amendment to do so. But the Democratic party has gone all-in on turning out the traditionally unreliable youth vote and centering Gen-Z and Millennials as the core of their base coalition. It therefore seems only a matter of time before the Parkland activists -- and various "trans youth"™️ -- become the mascots for such an endeavor, most likely led by some vapid influencer politico like AOC.

I really think lowering or even abolishing the minimum age for participating in the franchise is going to become a key plank in the more insidious campaign to normalize children being "affirmed" to "consent" to all sorts of adult vices. On the surface, it'll be about things like "climate future" or school shootings or "saving democracy from MAGA fascists" or whatever, that galvanizes public sympathy (as it was with the Vietnam War draft, when the American voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1971). But underneath and behind the scenes, the sinister intent and consequences couldn't be more severe.
[–] SaintHedwig 7 points

On the surface, it'll be about things like "climate future" or school shootings or "saving democracy from MAGA fascists" or whatever, that galvanizes public sympathy (as it was with the Vietnam War draft, when the American voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1971).

That's the whole kicker. The voting age USED to be 21, because 21 was considered the age of maturity and adulthood, but the military was conscripting younger than that. Instead of raising the minimum age of military service to ensure mature consent for both, we lowered the age of voting.
[–] pennygadget 3 points

Honestly, I wish the military and voting age would be raised back up to 21. Most people nowadays aren't ready for adulthood at eighteen.
[–] Galko 7 points

I saw (misogynistic) Matt Walsh pushing for moving the US voting age higher, more like 25. I can totally see this being the next side they attack, so they can push through even more legislation. I know I voted against my own self interests in my early 20s, and given the age of final brain development... Well...

[–] OwnLyingEyes 35 points Edited

Increasingly letting the mask slip that they've appointed themselves the unquestionable priests of a religious ideology...
[–] Seedy 28 points

How is she gay if her partner goes by he/they?

I mean, they’re obviously just lesbians but one of them is a gender special.
[–] VestalVirgin 14 points

Yeah, if they were at least consistent with their gendershit, they'd have to call themselves hetero.

But they always claim to belong to whatever group suits them best at that moment.
[–] pennygadget 2 points

I'm surprised they're not using "queer". Isn't "gay" transphobic now or whatever?
[–] OneStarWolf 31 points

Mask off. The gender cult is attempting to reorganize itself into an official religion. Gender ideology should be treated like the faith based religious nonsense it is and not be integrated into laws or forced onto women.
[–] BondiBlue 13 points

This and the crackpot theologian at Cambridge arguing for the "trans Jesus" make it pretty clear that's where this is going. And also that incredibly bizarre "church of the rainbow light" or whatever it's called, in Georgia or wherever it is. It's "Woke Scientology" and people need to start calling it that.
[–] sciurus 23 points

her fiancé Jensen

Hun, put down the Supernatural fanfic.
[–] pennygadget 9 points

They recently welcomed Ebony Dementia Darkness Raven Way into their polycule 🤣
[–] Hollyhock 6 points Edited

So, two lesbians? I wish she'd simply note, 'my wife and I' because then we could actually celebrate her job and I could point to her as a role model for young bi/lesbian women. This is why we can't have nice things.

Not surprised at all she's also a minister...you need magical thinking and a deep belief in one's subjective soul, like gender identity.
[–] Apricot_Ibex LGB Ally 🏳️‍🌈 20 points

She’d be pretty cool if she were a lesbian ordained chaplain who affirms that God is not a dude (I mean, after all, why would this all-powerful entity have human genitalia, and the Bible even says that god is neither male nor female, so why call god a “he” anyway? I’m not religious but if people are going to believe, at least drop the dick worship) BUT instead she went the gender route and is actively harming LGB and GNC youth by giving them body-altering conversion therapy. 🤦🏻‍♀️

So much for love, support, and acceptance. She’s a traitor who has thrown GNC girls under the bus. It’s the new “pray the gay away”— drug and mutilate the gay away, and all the kids who don’t fall into gender boxes.
[–] Alias_Rosie 16 points

Right? I was like, ok, lesbian chaplain, that will ruffle some feathers but who cares...? It's her weird gender ideaology that's coming with it now!

Given how strident some of these people seem, I do wonder how they can minister to conservative families, who will also need support during difficult times. They cannot be trying to "educate" them when Jr. is receiving chemo.
[–] VestalVirgin 11 points

They cannot be trying to "educate" them when Jr. is receiving chemo.

Oh, but they would try.

Those are the same people who whine that their mothers who have breast cancer get medically necessary mastectomies before their unnecessary, unhealthy mastectomy is scheduled.

They have zero empathy. I would definitely not put it past them to try and convert conservative families while the children are dying from cancer.

I just wonder how they are going to try that. Will they threaten those families with eternal hellfire if they don't convert to the Church of Genderism? Perhaps they'll try a "if you don't trans your child, they'll commit suicide and GO TO HELL!" approach?

Modern priests usually don't tell people that suicide is punished with eternal hellfire anymore, but considering how regressive the trans movement is in general, I wouldn't be surprised if they dig this out and re-use it, too.
[–] pennygadget 4 points

Given how strident some of these people seem, I do wonder how they can minister to conservative families, who will also need support during difficult times. They cannot be trying to "educate" them when Jr. is receiving chemo.

There's no way they can be impartial. These are the same people who tell you to cut off conservative family members, burn your Harry Potter merch, and tell kids to seek out a "glitter family" if their parents don't agree with their trans identity. I highly doubt they can be professional when dealing with an Orthodox Jewish or Christian family who don't want to play their pronoun games
[–] pennygadget 7 points

She’d be pretty cool if she were a lesbian ordained chaplain who affirms that God is not a dude (I mean, after all, why would this all-powerful entity have human genitalia, and the Bible even says that god is neither male nor female, so why call god a “he” anyway?

I don't think a children's hospital is the appropriate time or place to try and challenge the patriarchal religious beliefs of Christian families. They're not going to be super receptive to some lesbian chaplain telling them "God is nonbinary and female/homosexual chaplains are valid!" while their kid is dying from leukemia
[–] Apricot_Ibex LGB Ally 🏳️‍🌈 8 points Edited

Oh absolutely, the focus should be on compassionate care for the child and their family. The children should always come first in a children’s hospital!

I don’t know how chaplains are placed with families who request them, and just thought that she as a person could’ve been cool if she’d been placed with, for example, a young lesbian teen who might be struggling with mental health issues. She could’ve been a great, uplifting example specifically for a young GNC person who wants to speak with a chaplain, but instead she went genderwoo. I know there are some more progressive Christians in a state like Wisconsin, but obviously that’s not what every Christian family would be looking for and each would have their own needs, so that would be very complicated.

She could’ve possibly been a positive example for some kids to find self acceptance and self love without drugs and mutilation…but she’s the opposite. She’d encourage them to go trans.

I would imagine that ALL chaplains (whether liberal or conservative) probably need to keep their personal views out of their ministry for terminally ill or gravely ill children unless specifically requested by the families. It isn’t the time or place. She does seem to be very wrapped up in herself for someone who’s supposed to be serving sick children, and no surprise since she’s full-on TRA.
[–] Amareldys 12 points

Is this a "one of many" situation, where they have a Catholic Priest, a Rabbi, a Methodist, a Wiccan, etc? Or is this THE chaplain.
[–] pennygadget 9 points

Is this a "one of many" situation, where they have a Catholic Priest, a Rabbi, a Methodist, a Wiccan, etc? Or is this THE chaplain.

Thats a good question. I can't imagine, say, a religious Muslim or Catholic family being too pleased if they ask for a chaplain to pray with them and they're met with some quirky Cool Girl who prattles on about her queerness and her non-binary, 'Its Pat' cosplaying spouse
[–] pennygadget 9 points

Well, on the plus side, at least they're finally acknowledging that trans is a religion

Also, LOL at yet another bullshit make-work job created just to give some worthless trans activists something to do (and to funnel a ton of money to people who couldn't get a burger flipping job if left to their own devices)
Load more (6 comments)
© Ovarit LLC
About Ovarit | Rules | Guidelines | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Bugs | License

“All space becomes male space unless females maintain a concerted effort to mark a space for themselves.” –Sheila Jeffreys