Oh no, but we have to protect them from violence after they were violent to women. And protect their rights after they took away those woman’s rights. (Heavy sarcasm implied)
Hair, yes. Makeup no. That's supporting fetish behaviour and it's not fair to women who have no access to same. Nobody should have access to it.
Depends on the prison. Not all women's prisons ban cosmetics. The prisons don't provide them, but women can purchase them or people can send them. There are usually limits on what they can have.
Richard Speck did that and claimed to be having the time of his life. All TIMs can follow suit.
Even if we were to pretend it’s “genuine”, they’re in prison to be punished; not getting to move to the women’s prison or to get hormones and surgery should be part of that punishment.
Violent prisoners, yes. Certainly they shouldn't get the option of going to the prison of the sex they abused.
Someone in prison for a fraud or traffic offence, that's different.
It doesn' t matter what kind of crime they have committed, men, even the harmless ones, shouldn' t go to women' s prison.
Why should women be subjected to the presence of any man when they’re in prison? Even if he has never committed violence against women, whether incarcerated for it or not, it is a violation of their rights.
It's a violation of the Geneva Convention, which has a stipulation that women prisoners shall be kept separate from men
Prisoners should never be given the option to transition. Fuck no, you don't get to shoot up wrong sex hormones and wear makeup and act out your fetish on my dime.