36

6 comments

Sorry, I kept getting thrown off.

Sometimes I wonder if some of these wiki overlords are fetishists who spend the day shooting a load into their ill-fitting panty hose.

Oh absolutely. It's not even just on trans topics. There are editors who stake out "territory" and aggressively defend it in the face of all reality. They're essentially all male, and as far as I can tell any topic related to women is also riddled with TiMs. Wikipedia is only good for stuff that isn't even slightly controversial, unfortunately.

i wish someone would just delete that sentence that appears twice. i control+f'd "transgender" and was infuriated to see it appears now twice on the page, and now toward the top. ugh! GET OUT OF OUR ENCYCLOPEDIA ENTRIES

I find it frustrating that “transgenderism” is nowhere in the scientific controversy section/categories.