178

https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1402922169559044096

https://sex-matters.org/?p=12595

https://hiyamaya.net/?page_id=3905

(links to sex matters and Maya's site seem to be working now)

ETA Maya's statement on YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOIKlg71LJc

ETA 2 the full ruling

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1402922169559044096 https://sex-matters.org/?p=12595 https://hiyamaya.net/?page_id=3905 (links to sex matters and Maya's site seem to be working now) ETA Maya's statement on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOIKlg71LJc ETA 2 the full ruling https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

36 comments

[–] common_shrew 42 points (+42|-0)

Yes I was also surprised at the lengths they went to with that stuff too, even while criticising the fact that the original hearing went too far by starting to evaluate the belief itself.

Also if they’re going to be that finicky about it then joke’s on them because the ruling misgenders Bunce (p5):

b. Later that month, the Claimant made a number of comments about Pips/Philip Bunce, who is a senior director at Credit Suisse and describes himself as being “gender fluid” and “non-binary”.

[–] LadyGlum 17 points (+17|-0)

Bunce's pronouns, last time I checked, were he/she so she wasn't even misgendering him in the first place.

[–] common_shrew 7 points (+7|-0)

True! If she did, then so did this ruling. I would have expected the ruling to refer to “himself/herself” since it was being so particular about that stuff.