38

22 comments

[–] Lysiena 38 points (+38|-0)

One was suspended for 5 months and the other for 12. Seriously? They mutilated someone and that's it? Ridiculous and absolutely horrifying.

[–] Ronja 21 points (+21|-0) Edited

Suspension in doctor salary world means "take a break to sail around the world then come back refreshed and relaxed as if nothing happened".

[–] hmimperialtortie 32 points (+32|-0)

“Renowned penis consultant” 🙄

That poor woman. And the doctors are only getting minor suspensions?! Surely violating someone that much should result in some prison time.

[–] Traveller 13 points (+13|-0)

Only when doctors get their arses sued off will things like this stop

[–] Liz_B_Anne 10 points (+10|-0) Edited

So s/he wanted a penis AND a vagina? That makes no more sense than having just a fake penis added on. Not getting the outrage honestly. Sounds like the doctor did it on purpose, but why? I'm so confused.

[–] OneryBox 3 points (+3|-0)

Yeah, me too. I don't get it. Why did they want a penis but want to keep their vagina?

[–] Hiru 6 points (+6|-0)

Because she probably doubtful about herself and thought "maybe i can have the fake penis removed later and go back to normal"

I see people being like "poor woman", yeah well me i have no apathy for it, she wanted to pretend to be a man, deal with the consequence now

[–] BristlingBo2 3 points (+3|-0)

It's my understanding that a vaginectomy is a fairly dangerous procedure with a lot of complications and a full vaginectomy is really something they only do on cancer patients as a last resort. I mean I know all these trans surgeries are gruesome and doctors have had no scruples about performing them but it is possible this TIF did do a little more research than tumblr and saw some of the bad outcomes?

Science direct says this:

Many transgender men do not undergo a vaginectomy and/or phalloplasty as part of their gender transition. Some trans men enjoy and engage in vaginal intercourse. Risks associated with vaginectomy may outweigh the actual benefits for some patients, and this should be considered, especially since the vagina typically harbors minimal risk of pathology. Resection vaginectomy is associated with high rates of complications such as fistulae, voiding and defecatory dysfunction, and hemorrhage.

Many of the sources I can find seem to admit that it's a risky procedure but rush to assure you that "better" methods are emerging and outcomes are now "positive". Interestingly a lot of those sources seem to be about when it's a surgery being done for FTM transition. When they are talking about cancer patients, the tone changes somewhat.

[–] OneryBox 3 points (+3|-0)

Ahh, ok. That definitely makes sense. Makes these doctors even worse, given those complications and the fact that they are probably performing it on most of their patients.

[–] Researcher1536 8 points (+8|-0)

It's so mentally jarring to read so many words in a sentence that have nothing to do with each other in reality, yet here we are.

[–] crodish 7 points (+7|-0) Edited

I want to be empathic but honestly, just... I'm tired. I'm just so fucking jaded. They're dysphoric so they're trans, so they want gender affirming surgery, but they want to keep their vagina, but not boobs those trigger me, lop them off, except the vagina doesn't give them dysphoria somehow, but they're NOT a woman, he/him pronouns please, why did you remove my vagina???????

Yeah the operation without consent thing is bullshit of course and I'm glad the doctors are getting sued for falsifying the consent form, but jesus christ. The operation to give her a pEniS shouldn't have happened to begin with. None of this should be happening if the woke crowd didn't keep bullying their way into getting what they want and firing competent doctors and therapists who WOULD have been against said surgeries if they hadn't been fucking fired for being transphobic. At this point they're just a piranha feeding frenzy with innocents getting sucked into the mix.

"His failures were serious and numerous... The consequences of these failures were grave, Patient A underwent life changing and irreversible surgery which (they) did not want."

But cutting off healthy breasts and making a fake dick was fine because she consented to them, consent is so important omg. They would never have said the above about performing surgeries on yeet the teeters, because they WANTED to cut healthy body parts off.

[–] gizmocaca 3 points (+3|-0)

How have these doctors only been suspended? They should be struck off and never be allowed to practice medicine again.

Load more (1 comment)