17

5 comments

[–] RisingUp 1 points (+1|-0)

Does the law really say that? But then we’re not women. Unless the ‘process’ we underwent was conception?

And TIMs aren’t women either since they don’t become female.

Maybe you could argue that TIMs count because they take (or might take) pills ‘for the purpose of becoming female’ even though it doesn’t work. In that case TIMs who have a grip on reality also aren’t women. Only exceptionally delusional and stupid men are women.

[–] Livin [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

I don't know if the law really says it. I couldn't tell based on the article. I'm guessing it doesn't but that it could be changing towards that definition when self-id passes. I agree, it's a really confusing definition of woman and female, and doesn't seem to make much sense.