155

Its worth a read.

https://www.nytimes.com/1979/06/10/archives/male-and-female-created-he-them-transexual.html

This quote in particular,

"Still, why should anyone (especially feminist women) object to men wanting to become women? Isn't imitation the highest form of flattery?

Precisely herein lies the “liberal” sexologists’ betrayal of human dignity and integrity: They support the (male) transsexual's claim that he wants to be a woman — when, in fact, what he wants is to be a caricature of the male definition of “femininity.” "

Its worth a read. https://www.nytimes.com/1979/06/10/archives/male-and-female-created-he-them-transexual.html This quote in particular, "Still, why should anyone (especially feminist women) object to men wanting to become women? Isn't imitation the highest form of flattery? Precisely herein lies the “liberal” sexologists’ betrayal of human dignity and integrity: They support the (male) transsexual's claim that he wants to be a woman — when, in fact, what he wants is to be a caricature of the male definition of “femininity.” "

23 comments

‘Ostensibly, the “transsexers” (from psychologists to urologists) are curing a disease; actually, they engage in the religious and political shaping and controling of “masculine” and “feminine” behavior.’

Not even supposed to be considered a disease at this point. Just requires a scale of medical intervention only matched by those with severe and enduring illnesses.

Now now. We know getting their top surgery should be the MOST IMPORTANT THING EVER, even surpassing the needs of cancer patients.

😐