PubPeer is a central place to anonymously comment on any academic paper. It has what feels like an archaic UI, hasn't improved very much since it was first created but has led to numerous high profile retractions and fraud findings in science. Anonymous comments have been a very important capability to call out problems in papers from high profile scientists.
There have, in previous years, been comments on a number of "transgender" pieces that make unscientific claims in high profile journals, e.g.:
https://pubpeer.com/publications/0869164CF60C5897FBDD0EF59B487C
https://pubpeer.com/publications/5AE269A4A0232925E846E6AE9CF809
https://pubpeer.com/publications/BCA410E181D474A6AB696CEEEDF133
https://pubpeer.com/publications/0360115A4703000678D795177925DF
https://pubpeer.com/publications/6882235778300E040A36677EDED57A
I can confirm that new comments on similar sorts of papers are not being published on PubPeer. The moderation process is entirely opaque. A great shame given how important PubPeer has been in raising flags about terrible science.
Because Trans Activists are everywhere. Someone used the frame: Just like Homosexuality only it's Gender Identity.
Besides middle class Men wanted the ability to use their insurance to cover their "healthcare."
PhD in the medical science fields and MDs becoming radicallized TRAs has been the biggest surprise for this Regressive Movement.
They know better. All of a sudden they become speculative fiction writers.
" We studied 10 members from the indigenous population in the Amazon rainforest. One of these subjects was observed to be Genderfluid. We are positing that an orchid frequently eaten had the botanical equivalent Estrogen.
More studies are required, but this could be a clue."/s