48

PubPeer is a central place to anonymously comment on any academic paper. It has what feels like an archaic UI, hasn't improved very much since it was first created but has led to numerous high profile retractions and fraud findings in science. Anonymous comments have been a very important capability to call out problems in papers from high profile scientists.

There have, in previous years, been comments on a number of "transgender" pieces that make unscientific claims in high profile journals, e.g.:

https://pubpeer.com/publications/0869164CF60C5897FBDD0EF59B487C

https://pubpeer.com/publications/5AE269A4A0232925E846E6AE9CF809

https://pubpeer.com/publications/BCA410E181D474A6AB696CEEEDF133

https://pubpeer.com/publications/0360115A4703000678D795177925DF

https://pubpeer.com/publications/6882235778300E040A36677EDED57A

I can confirm that new comments on similar sorts of papers are not being published on PubPeer. The moderation process is entirely opaque. A great shame given how important PubPeer has been in raising flags about terrible science.

[PubPeer](https://pubpeer.com/) is a central place to anonymously comment on any academic paper. It has what feels like an archaic UI, hasn't improved very much since it was first created but has led to numerous high profile retractions and fraud findings in science. Anonymous comments have been a very important capability to call out problems in papers from high profile scientists. There have, in previous years, been comments on a number of "transgender" pieces that make unscientific claims in high profile journals, e.g.: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0869164CF60C5897FBDD0EF59B487C https://pubpeer.com/publications/5AE269A4A0232925E846E6AE9CF809 https://pubpeer.com/publications/BCA410E181D474A6AB696CEEEDF133 https://pubpeer.com/publications/0360115A4703000678D795177925DF https://pubpeer.com/publications/6882235778300E040A36677EDED57A I can confirm that new comments on similar sorts of papers are not being published on PubPeer. The moderation process is *entirely* opaque. A great shame given how important PubPeer has been in raising flags about terrible science.

5 comments

Genderism is the most ridiculous religion of all time, with more power than Scientology, and we desperately need separation of church and science.

It's really a shame the whole scientific community has been indoctrinated by transgender ideology, so much to the point that some organizations are saying it isn't even a mental illness. Body dysmorphia and gender dysphoria share many common symptoms, so why does one group get their feelings/delusions affirmed and the other doesn't?

Because Trans Activists are everywhere. Someone used the frame: Just like Homosexuality only it's Gender Identity.

Besides middle class Men wanted the ability to use their insurance to cover their "healthcare."

PhD in the medical science fields and MDs becoming radicallized TRAs has been the biggest surprise for this Regressive Movement.

They know better. All of a sudden they become speculative fiction writers.

" We studied 10 members from the indigenous population in the Amazon rainforest. One of these subjects was observed to be Genderfluid. We are positing that an orchid frequently eaten had the botanical equivalent Estrogen.

More studies are required, but this could be a clue."/s

[–] mittimithai [OP] male 4 points Edited

As you suggest, the denial of sex and elevation of pseudoscientific notion of gender identity in contexts ranging from medical practice to scientific journals is an indictment of the entire Institution of Science.

The worst is they are getting grant money for the pseudo science research projects.

The ultimate Holy Grail and biological "space race" is to successfully transplant a uterus in a TIM.