Delighted. State by state, will have to be the way to go. I think the pro-life religious wing of the GOP underestimates the just socially-liberal enough republican voters. It was also MRAs of all murky political persuasions unified in misogyny that were also crowing at the time of the Supreme Court action.
All the hos will move out of state leaving us with Good Girls Inc.
Diddums, I said, you realise it's child support /mother fist/'No glove, no love' time for you, boy! The ratio of downvotes were so worth it.
"Just socially-liberal enough republican voters". Yes, and women have had the right to safe, legal abortion for very nearly FIFTY YEARS. That's two generations of people born growing up with safe, legal abortion.
Children, gather round, and let me tell you about a distant time...a time when there were sensible, moderate, even pro-choice Republicans. They were called "Rockefeller Republicans". Nelson Rockefeller (Grandson of John D., founder of Standard Oil) was appointed VP by Gerald Ford. This was a political game of musical chairs which was started by both President Nixon and VP Spiro Agnew resigning. But that part isn't relevant.
From Wikipedia: As Governor of New York from 1959 to 1973, Rockefeller's achievements included the expansion of the State University of New York, efforts to protect the environment, the construction of the Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller Empire State Plaza in Albany, increased facilities and personnel for medical care, and the creation of the New York State Council on the Arts. Rockefeller supported reform of New York's abortion laws beginning around 1968. The proposals supported by his administration would not have repealed the long-standing prohibition, but would have expanded the exceptions allowed for the protection of the mother's health, or in circumstances of fetal abnormality. The reform bills did not pass. However, when an outright repeal of the prohibition managed to pass in 1970, Rockefeller signed it. In 1972, he vetoed another bill that would have restored the abortion ban. He said in his 1972 veto message, "I do not believe it right for one group to impose its vision of morality on an entire society."[49]
That sure doesn't sound like the Repuke party since Reagan!!!
There is some of that. Several of my guy friends have scheduled vasectomies. And for all of the problems in Kansas, especially in social services, they will go after deadbeat dads for child support. Anything to get responsibility off of the state and onto the parents.
The tail is wagging the dog in the USA. Even the red states don't want this christofascist crap being thrust down our throats. Perhaps a few Kansan men have realized they don't want to be on the hook for child support for eighteen years as well. I doubt that all of them were voting with the welfare of women in mind.