32

https://twitter.com/cocainecross/status/1553506807766663169

https://archive.ph/bQUyT

Some of this might include some of the same things in another Depp twitter thread that was posted here a couple days ago, but I saw some things that I don't remember seeing when I read that thread.

The one piece of evidence that should have shut this whole thing down was Amber's phone video of Johnny trashing the kitchen in a drunk violent outburst. That behavior is abuse, and if he hadn't done it before - probably more than once - she wouldn't have known to catch it on video. She doesn't have to be a perfect victim, or even a particularly good person, to have been abused. He claims she libeled him by calling him an abuser; he's shown to be abusive on video; that should have been the end of the story.

https://twitter.com/cocainecross/status/1553506807766663169 https://archive.ph/bQUyT Some of this might include some of the same things in another Depp twitter thread that was posted here a couple days ago, but I saw some things that I don't remember seeing when I read that thread. The one piece of evidence that should have shut this whole thing down was Amber's phone video of Johnny trashing the kitchen in a drunk violent outburst. That behavior is abuse, and if he hadn't done it before - probably more than once - she wouldn't have known to catch it on video. She doesn't have to be a perfect victim, or even a particularly good person, to have been abused. He claims she libeled him by calling him an abuser; he's shown to be abusive on video; that should have been the end of the story.

Show comments

5 comments

Don't hold your breath waiting for all the media to pick this up and set the record straight. We know they don't like to put male dirty laundry on full blast like they do to women.

[–] SecondSkin 18 points Edited

The UK judgement should have ended it.

We are one of the easiest countries to win a libel suit in, the burden of proof is on the defendant. And with a multi conglomerate like the sun group, they tend to opt to settle quickly out of court as it’s almost always cheaper. Yet Depp lost- 12 out of 14 incidents the judge found there was evidence to show these were definitely were his abuse of her. And he was refused the opportunity to appeal. Anyone can read the judgement, her descriptions are detailed and credible, there’s many witnesses and lots of texts/messages/videos etc the judge saw. And Depp’s answers pretty much all say I don’t remember that so it didn’t happen.

[–] Carrots90 12 points Edited

I love all the dudes who feel like they identify with Johnny Depp. Sticking it to the system that feminism has created and some stuck up Stacey

Except the people they should identify with are the staff, which is how JD would see them. The man is disgustingly rich and yet refusing to pay regular people for the work they’ve done.

25 grand can mean the difference between losing and keeping a home to a working person.

It’s not even a fun night out for JD and the people he actually would have as friends.

And yet he will cheat them out of what they earned. Literally stealing from the poor.

And they think this guy couldn’t abuse his wife?

And they also think JD would see them with anything other than contempt?

[–] [Deleted] 9 points Edited

That was insane, everything we knew but what was insane is that the evidence against him was so overwhelming and he still won. The corruption is vomitous. All the people in that court should be under investigation for the miscast of justice they helped facilitate.