YES‼️ I’m a brown immigrant from a third world country, and your observation that “LibFems don’t care about me, they care about what I can do for them” is SO true for me too! Honestly, I think it’s just another form of racism. It’s just as insidious and dehumanizing, and I’m forced to shut up about it lest I be branded some sort of “terf” or “white-adjacent” or whatever they like to label people of color who disagree with them.
I am going to edit my other comment to add that the slight leeway vis a vis freedom of speech that the Wokerati provide for women of color in majority white nations is itself stemming from racism, as they can’t continue their minstrel parade of Wokeness if they can be openly seen silencing said women, so they just don’t say anything at all (or the more bold ones will call women of color who speak honestly about feminism “white feminists” too, perhaps with a less vicious pile-on). Considering that protecting their own interests and continuing to exploit women of color for woke points is the only reason for slightly less viciousness- i.e., racism is the only reason- it’s actually not less vicious, it’s more vicious in that it’s indicative not of cognitive dissonance but of awareness that they, the white people, are using women of color to prove themselves good people. At least they have the honesty to accord white women the respect of viciously attacking them over their views, whereas the women of color being used for virtue signaling aren’t even seen as real people worth engaging with on an issue; rather they are seen as props, and when they malfunction, simply drop them and move on to the next one.
You’re absolutely right. And I say that because what you’re saying pretty much reflects the way I’ve been treated all my life by the Wokerati, by whom I’ve been surrounded most of my life, living in California. The condescension; the constant, subtle patronizing; the ingrained assumption that they know more and understand more than you; and then you get the hostility-disguised-as-concern.
It always blew my mind how more conservative, less “educated”, more working-class and/or blue collar people (of all races and backgrounds) were far more likely to treat me as a fellow human being and not some exotic specimen from a foreign land. Not to say that right-wingers were always welcoming and accepting - far from it! Many weren’t, but many also were. And at least with them you knew where they stand, what they really thought. Much easier to deal with, and avoid if needed!😂
Okay, but I have an observation I wish to share - this is strictly about engaging in dialogue, not the parading of minorities. I have no experience with that, as our country is not set up that way. But our country is set up that it is very hard to speak about feminism between races, as the moment I don t agree with someone of a different race (even if the conversation has been and still is strictly about feminism), someone will pop up and call me a racist. And, like most wokers, it will only take about 5 minutes before I was banned from the group entirely. Now everyone (except me) feels validated, but the feminist conversation has died. Therefore I seldom engage in any debate with other races, simply because I can't. Now, maybe this works differently in the US, but I know I often feel powerless. How do we prevent this from happening?
I have noticed how white liberal feminists parade black women in what I can only call a show of minstrelsy, in order to prove their woke credentials. It has nothing to do with “listening to black people,” and is no different than that hilarious photo op of Trump with his black supporters (hilarious because he could not pretend to pray for even one minute, lol).
I have also noticed that when I have spoken up for sex-based rights, and when I have discussed my own experiences of constant sexual assault and rape, it is black women who silently like or might be brave enough to actually comment and agree, saying my experiences echo theirs; not white women, who will instead proceed to verbally burn me at the stake, all while, in the height of irony, calling me a white feminist.
I am guessing that my experiences of sexism are more akin to many black women’s because I have also been picked on for intersectional reasons (if libfems actually understood intersectionality, they wouldn’t come after me this way; they fail to realize white women can also experience other axes of oppression apart from sexism), because of my mental differences (I won’t say illnesses) of ADHD and bipolar 2. Predatory men pick on the most vulnerable and despised women of society, so they pick on women of color, poor women, prostituted women, addicted women, and mentally atypical women. My risk of rape was nearly the same of that of a Native American woman, slightly more than that of an African-American woman; and once you’ve been raped once, especially young, the chances of it happening to you again skyrocket. I have found that women of color and other white women with difficult backgrounds or mental difference understand my experiences of sexism a lot better than your average white libfem. Then again, maybe those white libfems have similar experiences and don’t speak about them for fear of being branded white feminists, I don’t know.
This was a long way of saying I have always been a radical feminist, because I have always had my eyes open. I find similarities in the kind of sexism I’ve faced when I meet women from other countries like Mexico or South Korea. What liberal feminists can’t admit is that it happens here too and yes it is that bad. Our problems in the States, including for the most privileged of women, are as bad as they are for women in South Korea; we’re just policing each other from talking about it.
I have always related more to women who have experienced the same level of sexism I have and can speak about it openly. This is usually women of color, both because they are also more targeted and because they have slightly less to fear from the Wokerati, although it’s cold comfort considering the Wokerati don’t actually make life better for anyone, they just virtue signal, and the tiny amount of freedom of speech afforded women of color in some circles doesn’t protect them from the systemic violence and disenfranchisement they face from the rest of society, which of course woke liberals do absolutely no real work to remediate.
Edited to add that the slight leeway vis a vis freedom of speech that the Wokerati provide for women of color in majority white nations is itself stemming from racism, as they can’t continue their minstrel parade of Wokeness if they can be openly seen silencing said women, so they just don’t say anything at all (or the more bold ones will call women of color who speak honestly about feminism “white feminists” too, perhaps with a less vicious pile-on). Considering that protecting their own interests and continuing to exploit women of color for woke points is the only reason for slightly less viciousness- i.e., racism is the only reason- it’s actually not less vicious, it’s more vicious in that it’s indicative not of cognitive dissonance but of awareness that they, the white people, are using women of color to prove themselves good people. At least they have the honesty to accord white women the respect of viciously attacking them over their views, whereas the women of color being used for virtue signaling aren’t even seen as real people worth engaging with on an issue; rather they are seen as props, and when they malfunction, they simply drop them and move on to the next one.
I am not black, (middle eastern/west Asian) but I grew up surrounded by black people. Moving to a predominantly white place was jarring for me. They are passive aggressive as hell and only want you (and anyone darker than the shade of eggshell) to speak up solely to confirm their beliefs on your kind.
I spoke out against Islam and was called "biased". Yeah, it's a garbage religion that treats women like shit. Reality is my bias, Tiffany.
This is why I am so against the blm movement, when white people shout BLM they don’t mean it, they only want their picture posted online at a blm March so they can say that they are activists and progressive but then turn around avoid the black person at work, give them the shitty jobs at work, don’t stop for black people in the streets who try to cross the street (but they would for a white person), they avoid places where a lot of black people life, think “this is a shitty part of town” when driving past a playground full of black kids, assume nothing when the full cast to a show is all white, are surprised and feel “betrayed” when they find out the podcast speaker is black.
There’s only so much I know as a white immigrant... but I feel that blm will make things worse in work cities, on an individual level.
This is tone-deaf and ironic to me.
So you're against a movement for black people because of the way SOME white people behave within that movement? Do you also feel that women should cease certain movements and strategies based on the way men behave or is it only us blacks who have to toe this line?
What alternatives would you as a white person suggest that we as black people do, and why are you better qualified to decide them than Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, Opal Tometi and the thousands of black activists networking under the BLM banner?
I’m only talking about the parroting that happens in relation to it by those who are only interested in the brownie points. not the movement itself and what it stands for.
And I don’t know what a black person should do, but white people should do more than just chant the next woke think without thinking about it and thinking “well only xyz people are racist I would never be racist” and being in an echo chamber of “us vs them” stops them from being able to se their own biases.
White libfems crack me up.
I'm in a hobby group with thousands of people that slants white. I think I've seen one person from Mexico, and there could be one or two here or there I've missed, but I'm definitely a token within the group as a known black woman.
The majority have pronouns in their bios, trans/non-binary flags in their forum signatures, the whole woke accessory line. Yet when I brought up (and I'll admit I did it just for fun) that the very strictly enforced 'no chatspeak' rule also targeted black people for saying things like 'tryna,' the push back was immediate and adamant. When I brought up code switching being part of daily life I got crickets.
A bit later someone posted in off-topic wailing about the Capitol terrorism and how they just wanted stuff to go back to normal (TM)! This time I was sincere in saying violence has always been a normal part of our lives. I explained what it's actually like being black in America, like how my neighbors have called the police over a "suspicious person" who was in fact a relative waiting on my own damn porch for me to get home.
I got heaps of praise and many thanks for "saying this" (which is a bit off-putting for reasons that would take another post to explain, but I know they mean well so I leave it be). Five people even privately messaged me to talk about how I was sooo brave and seemed eager to have conversations. Okay, fine.
Without fail, all but one turned to talking about identity politics. You see, they cooommmpletely understood what I was going through, because they're part of "LGBTQA+" being "genderfluid" or their sister is "genderfluid."
I told them all, a lot gentler than I normally approach this topic at that, that actually the gender movement had brought me a lot of harm both as a black woman and a lesbian and I gave examples of how, but in passive ways that were open for discussion.
Crickets.
Not a single one of them has spoken to me there, on the forums, or on the discord since, and I'm sure I'm on some sort of Evil TERF list now but they can't openly brand me the way they would a white woman after all that public display of omgeward it's sooo great to hear bLacK vOicEs spEakiNg uP!
Libfems don't care about me, they care about what I can do for them. Dealing with them is no different than dealing with men of their ilk.