I really think a lot of this is unloved people desperate to feel special
Its also boring people wanting to feel "oppressed"
I hate to say it, (and it's tough to articulate clearly what I mean without ruffling some feathers- I hope I'm successful here!) but "cool sex with females" has been sold to a straight female market now. Through porn and pop culture. Through sex pozz libfeminism too. And females are buying it and trying it for themselves.
We've been turned into consumable commodities for each other now. Not just men anymore.
You're not wrong. Even before "qweer" shit took over everything, a lot of girls fell into the trap of claiming to be bisexual and making out with other girls at parties in order to titillate scrotes
Yep. If you ask people why they insist on saying queer instead of gay or lesbian they'll say it's more "inclusive". But inclusive of what? LGB includes all people who experience same sex attraction. Everything after the B is just straight people.
People get stuck on "inclusion" because it has a strong positive connotation in the USA, I think largely due to the history of racial segregation. Obviously being inclusive to all races is a normative good.
But you can't just change the target of "inclusion" and carry over that previous good will. Easy, obvious example -- An elementary school should never be "inclusive" of pedophiles/sex offenders. You don't have to go to that extreme to understand why "inclusive" isn't always objectively a good thing... universities and companies are "exclusionary" to the overwhelming majority of applicants because they would not be able to function if they accepted 100% of people who applied.
Terms lose their meaning when they become "inclusive" of their antonyms. The term vegan will never be "inclusive" of meat eaters. The term Muslim will never be "inclusive" of Christians. This isn't normatively or morally wrong, it's literally just terms having meanings.
The term "queer" exists to make LGB "inclusive" of straight people. But then when you include straight you end up with 100% of the population. So all you've done is make the category meaningless. "Queer" is a meaningless term.
In a way I guess it could be a good idea to defang slurs by making them completely meaningless, but it's not at all helpful when people say "queer" when they mean gay, lesbian or bisexual. It just erases those groups of people
This is why I don't like "queer". I actually don't mind the whole "slur reclaimation" thing. If homosexual people generally wanted to refer to themselves as queer instead of "LGB" I don't care. But that's not how the term is used—it's used as you say, to make gay spaces, activism, etc. inclusive to het or het leaning people.
Also great examples!
Reminds me of a white woman who is an influencer I used to like. She dates only men and thirsts over TIMs but since she’s bi she says “her people” are being killed (referring to gay rights) and since being white isn’t oppressed enough, her 8% Cherokee heritage now means “her people” are being killed.
It’s ok to just be yourself. You don’t have to be every flavor of Victim
"Queer" will never not be a slur to me. It's like the N word.
A friend of mine recently decided to end her het marriage and date women. Now it's all "queer" this and "gay" that. Like honey, chill. You're a bisexual woman same as me. No need to shave half your head and adopt other identities. I really think a lot of this is unloved people desperate to feel special