I'm seeing a lot more of this language come up, not just this prof but other writings. "Pregnant child." So a girl is not old enough to consent to pregnancy but is old enough to consent to surgical mutilation or heavy-duty medication because she "feels" "like a boy" (or "feels" she would rather be, so as to escape exploitative sexualization). Only to get out of the frying pan and into the fire because she's just being roped into a different kind of exploitative sexualization.
There are no "trans kids."
I'm seeing a lot more of this language come up, not just this prof but other writings. "Pregnant child." So a *girl* is not old enough to consent to pregnancy but is old enough to consent to surgical mutilation or heavy-duty medication because she "feels" "like a boy" (or "feels" she would rather be, so as to escape exploitative sexualization). Only to get out of the frying pan and into the fire because she's just being roped into a different kind of exploitative sexualization.
There are no "trans kids."
I take it as she is excusing puberty blockers.
“Kids aren’t supposed to hit puberty until 19 anyway” or whatever
I don’t think she gives a poop about csa