47

35 comments

If a penis was just an inside out vagina, then why don’t phalloplasty surgeries just invert the vagina instead of mutilating their arms? Why is it only for men that they use the existing genitalia?

I love how confident this person is whilst spouting complete nonsense.

They also got an award for this, so someone actually agrees with them.

[–] LonelyKindred Jaded Tomboy 4 points

To give you a bit of hopium, redditors tend to award things ironically at times. Exceptionally good and absurdly terrible takes both get awarded.

[–] furyosa MERF 30 points

Scientifically, sex is like a slider in a video game.

I knew these character customization apps in games were behind a lot of this disconnected-from-you-actual-body way of thinking.

That plus "puberty (testosterone or estrogen) will slowly push the slider to one side or the other" gives me the impression that this person thinks that a boy given estrogen before puberty or a girl given testosterone will grow a vagina or penis, respectively, without surgery.

Does he not remember having a penis as a boy?

No penises are assigned after birth, all babies look like barbies below the belly. /s

Thats the exact image I have in my head when I hear "sex assigned at birth".

Lmao hes taken what he knows about neovag surgery and processed it backwards to imagine what a vagina is without ever trying to find out the actual biology. A vagina is not an inverted penis, its literally an organ and tissue that a male does not have.

No, a nEoVaGiNa is literally a penis inverted and pulled inwards.

These people are fucking morons.

They're so deluded. I don't even think they should be able to use the term "neovagina" because those artificially constructed flesh tubes are nothing like a real vagina. They don't self-lubricate, they're not self-cleaning, they don't connect to a cervix, and they're not a birth canal for babies. They close up if you don't dilate them. Vaginas don't close back up if don't stick a dildo up there for 2 hours a day. I don't know how medical doctors can ethically tell their patients they can give them a vagina. It's not even close.

Tell me you think women orgasm through vaginal stimulation and know nothing of the clitoris & how genitals actually develop (eg penis and clitoris are homologous) without telling me.

And this is why your kids shouldn't have unfettered access to the internet. They'll either listen to this moron, or become him.

Males do not start out as 'female' in the womb they start out with cloacas and tails like birds which both start differring in the 8th week (as a layman explanation). Isn't evolution cool.

Males and females could both be pooping, egging (gameting(?)), and peeing outside of the same superficially identical hole if mammalian natural selection was different. You would still be a man or a woman with the unicloaca though because you would have balls or ova or an associated dimorphic physical system with it to reproduce

I've heard it being put like this: the development we go through in the womb mimicks the evolution we went through as a species.

Load more (12 comments)