Did this person confuse force (oftentimes being more capable openers of jars) and violence or is he just mental? Since we do not live in the days of yore, never once has the Nigel gone out, killed a pig brutally and then skinned it with his teeth to gift me a pigskin coat. This would be the only scenario I would see myself benefitting from male violence.

I assume his confusion is that he thinks male violence protects us from violence without considering that we would not need protection if not for male violence (e.g., glorifying soldiers or men walking us home at night).