41

12 comments

[–] MidnightLanguor 21 points (+22|-1)

But she has literally said she would pass HR5 unammended, which categorically erases women's sex-based rights. She is vocally pro-trans agenda. She does not support women's rights and would support legislation that erodes them.

[–] gender_is_oppression [OP] 12 points (+12|-0) Edited

If you have more updated news--let me know. I realize there's been a lot of institutional capture and the progressives may have bullied her into recanting this "regressive stance" (lol) as this article puts it. But she was still standing strong last time I checked.

[–] [Deleted] 16 points (+16|-0)

I hope she stays strong. I guess she's met a lot of women in prostitution while working as a prosecutor, probably she doesn't have the rosy view of the "liberated sex worker" many "progressives" are imagining.

[–] RisingUp 10 points (+10|-0) Edited

The TRAs seem to hate her, which has to be good news. I hope they go after her hard. TRA exposure is the number one cause of TERFery.

edit here they are dogpiling the ridiculous Amanda Jette Knox for supporting Kamala. https://twitter.com/MavenOfMayhem/status/1293285209459363848

Is she really pro-prison? Or is she just against prison abolition? Most of their reasons for hating her are reasons to support her. And TRAs want to abolish prisons because having sex offenders running round loose is a utopian vision for them. But the American prison system is a massive systemic ongoing human rights violation, if she doesn't want to reform it that's a big problem. Can't figure out what she actually said underneath all the TIM screeching and hyperbole.

[–] Luckystar 3 points (+3|-0)

Knox is pure masochist at this point. She lives to self flagellate for the transes.

[–] halfthesky 6 points (+6|-0)

Author Elizabeth Nolan Brown appears to be a sex-positive libfem who really doesn't like Kamala Harris.

She founded a group she calls Feminists for Liberty https://twitter.com/FeministLiberty

[–] [Deleted] 5 points (+5|-0)

Libertarian feminism, huh? Hard to picture what that could even mean.

[–] Boudicaea 0 points (+0|-0)

Libertarians like to redefine words to suit their whims, especially the word libertarian. So it really is probably meaningless, if you think about.

[–] [Deleted] 6 points (+6|-0)

Wow, didn't know that, definitely makes me think higher of her!

[–] [Deleted] 4 points (+4|-0)

This is really good news, I haven't actually looked into her record that much but I have resigned myself to voting against trump because RBG

[–] finn-again 0 points (+0|-0)

If Harris clearly stands for the Nordic Model, this piece does a lot to obscure this and the law itself by vaguely referencing her relationship to what sounds like an unworkable, unfair, and un-working approach to prostitution. (We know much better, but do the readers?)