39
Write or Call In CampaignCanada's Bill 6: a shocking pile of deliberate and evil deception
Posted January 30, 2021 by Elegantissima in Activism

Today I read the text of Canada's Bill 6 in order to help my neighbor write to her MP.

This is what I found.

This is the preamble to Bill 6:

Whereas conversion therapy causes harm to the persons, and in particular [to] the children, who are subjected to it;

Whereas conversion therapy causes harm to society because, among other things, it is based on and propagates myths and stereotypes about sexual orientation and gender identity, including the myth that a person’s sexual orientation and gender identity can and ought to be changed;

And whereas, in light of those harms, it is important to discourage and denounce the provision of conversion therapy in order to protect the human dignity and equality of all Canadians;

That makes it look like Bill 6 is meant to stop children from being transitioned.

A good thing!

HOWEVER, it's a deliberate deception. Lower down they define "conversion" as keeping the child the same sex they already are.

Conversion Therapy

Definition of conversion therapy

320.‍101 In sections 320.‍102 to 320.‍106, conversion therapy means a practice, treatment or service designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual or gender identity to cisgender.

Notice that "conversation therapy" is very specifically NOT defined as: "change a person's gender identity to transgender."

They're doing two really horrible things here:

  1. They're claiming that "conversion therapy" is "changing the child to cisgender" i.e. keeping the child the same sex they already are

  2. They're lumping trans issues together with sexual orientation

It is not "conversion" to stay the way you already are. That is SUCH an evil thing for them to bury in the small print.

And transgender issues have nothing whatsoever to do with sexual orientation. They have latched onto the gay community because it provides them cover. They are literally wolves in sheeps' clothing.

So this Bill 6 is a horrifying manipulation of the law, meant to legally stop anyone from speaking up against transitioning children.

You want to tell your MPs:

  • You oppose medically transitioning children

  • You oppose calling it "conversion therapy" to keep children's bodies the way they already are

  • You support children remaining the sex they already are, until they are 18 and can make their own decisions about their bodies

  • And you are shocked at this horrifying manipulation of the law meant to legally stop anyone from speaking up against medically transitioning children

My god, these people are evil.


I wrote a sample letter for her to send to her MP. Please feel free to use it:

Dear Member of Parliament,

We are liberal Canadians, and we are writing to instruct you, as our MP, to vote NO on Bill 6.

We repeat: vote NO on Bill 6.

This is a national emergency, in which all Canadian children are being endangered by duplicitous legal language and a blatant attempt to deceive Canadian voters. Bill 6 is a dangerous and dishonest bill, written specifically to convince Canadians that we are voting for the exact opposite of what this bill stipulates.

The preamble to Bill 6 states:

Whereas conversion therapy causes harm. . .in particular [to] the children . .including the myth that a person’s sexual orientation and gender identity can and ought to be changed;

This preamble sounds to the average Canadian as though Bill 6 is meant to stop a child's gender identity from being medically changed.

However, in the legal language of Bill 6, "conversion therapy" is defined as:

to change a person’s. . .gender identity to cisgender.

Conversion therapy is very specifically NOT defined as:

to change a person's gender identity to transgender.

This means that the average Canadian, who believes they are voting to stop the medical transitioning of children, is, in fact, voting for the exact opposite: to force us to allow the medical transitioning of our children.

Bill 6 can NOT be passed in its current form. It must be altered to remove "gender identity" and resubmitted as protection for "sexual orientation" and "sexual orientation" only.

Otherwise, Canadians will be legally forced to submit to the reckless and irresponsible medical conversion of our children to transgender. And we will be unable to object, under penalty of law.

Edit: Also, Bill 6 would introduce the word "cisgender" to the criminal code, where it currently does not appear.

4 comments

BlackCirce🔮 🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖🐖November 15, 2023

The original tweet is right. It is a pendulum. The “manosphere” is a consequence of the gains women made in the second wave of feminism and beyond.

No one wants “unity of the sexes” more than women. Women give birth to men, nurse and teach them. Women fall in love with men, give them affection and sex. Women protect men’s reputations by keeping their secrets. Men in return define themselves in antagonistic opposition to women and design systems to own and control women. If women’s love and care of men was going to change anything, it would already be changed. Even today, women still want close loving equal relationships with men, and are disappointed when they fail to achieve them. Whatever women give, men will take. Women giving of ourselves to men does not inspire men to give things to us.

Lastly, I don’t care. My beliefs serve me well. Male pandering women are not remembered by history. Women who stand up to men are the ones remembered, the ones who matter. It doesn’t take every single woman to fight, only a few. Sometimes only one. If some women would rather focus on appeasing men, so be it.

EavaNovember 16, 2023

We really have to start using the term "structural misogyny", just like structural racism. It isn't "woke". As maligned as "CRT" has been by being painted as the result of Butlerian postmodernism, critical race theory has its roots in radical feminist analysis, not postmodernism. But liberal feminism has abandoned the radical feminist structural analysis of patriarchy and instead embraced Butlerian postmodernism.

WrennNovember 16, 2023

The irony here is that the liberal feminists are the unknowing puppets of the MRAs.

Fighting all day for men’s rights to rape, filmed rape, and access to our spaces. Handing themselves up on a platter and calling it “empowerment”.

[Deleted]November 16, 2023

It truly is a shame for the incels and the liberal feminists that they hate each other so much. They're each others closest ideological allies and also each other's biggest enablers