49
NSFW
MisogynyName the Problem: MALES--Not "people" are mass US shooters
New York Times: "A Disturbing New Pattern in Mass Shootings: Young Assailants Six of the nine deadliest mass shootings in the United States since 2018 were by people who were 21 or younger, a shift from earlier decades."
NOT "People"! MALES!!! When will MSM name and investigate the SEX of mass shooters? They do everything to ignore the glaring problem and pattern: male violence.
They will focus on race, religion, age like the NYT did here everything but SEX.
This is another reason why I hate the “gender neutral language” not only does it erase women, it makes it hard to talk about male violence.
Yes. And also MSM explains mass shootings mostly, these days, by mental health issues. Let's look at everything except the most obvious and probably the most important: male violence against women, woman hating, male entitlement, male drive towards destruction...
Thank-you for this. Also, when people start spouting off "well men are victims too." I want to throw this in their face. There may be male victims also yes, but who by and large is perpetrating crimes against people? It is about power. If they admit, its largely male violence, then they would have to take accountability and they can't have that.
They do this with everything. If it reflects negatively on men it's "people" who are the problem. Or alternatively they remove them from the narrative by talking about someone being raped as if it's something that randomly happens and not a deliberate act by a man.
Similar thread I started
https://ovarit.com/o/NameTheProblem/98011/usa-school-shootings-are-male-violence
I once made a gun nut I know IRL lose his goddamn mind when we were arguing about what was to be done with gun control. He kept blabbing about how shootings are the price of freedom and people will always need guns Blah blah blah. So I said “I agree. But let’s be safe about this. 99% of all school and mass shooting are committed by men. Women own guns but none of them do shootings. Let’s amend the laws that only women are allowed to purchase guns and use them recreationally. Males wanting to use and learn about guns will have to be accompanied by a female chaperone at all times while the gun is on their person. Any woman who is found letting male relatives/partners/randoms handling the gun and using it without her supervision and guidance will get her liscence revoked. It’s the safest way because women are the only demographic that safely and responsibly uses guns!”
He lost his fucking shit. Just hilarious.
I love this. A great solution to male's mishandling of guns. You should send this idea to every member of US congress because they are so clueless as to how to end male gun violence. it is funny but true.
It was a parody of a solution and in jest. In reality, if this system were ever a thing I could see how angry men/abhsive husbands could armtwist wives into buying guns and them using the gun to murder her
Love it.
He was like “you have to be joking right! This is a joke.” And when I tried my best to seem 100% serious he was spouted some stuff and went on a tangent about how women haven’t committed mass shootings yet because they’re too afraid too but as time goes on a lot of female mass shooters will appear….I doubt it
I would love to see campaigns to restrict male access to guns.
It's not equivalent to restricting female access to contraception / abortion.
But it's pretty damn funny watching them lose their minds as if mandatory castration were being tabled.
EDIT: At least he didn't try flail around and pretend the truth wasn't true, I guess?
He did try to claim that the reason men kill is that their emotions are stigmatized and they aren’t “loved” and cared for in the same way girls are so naturally they try DIY therapy by murdering schoolchildren. You can’t argue about male violence with gun nuts. They just deflect and deflect and deflect and they don’t give a fuck about dead kids, all they selfishly care about is their own ability to collect death sticks and maybe fire them at a shooting range once every three months.
Oh hurl.
Those poor emotionally repressed child mass shooters.
Because being oppressed doesn't make a woman murderously rageous. Yet... The list of RF motivated mass shootings vs incel / racist motivated mass shootings aren't really measuring up.
And yet somehow, in spite of hundreds of years of patriarchy; you haven’t seen a single woman mass shooter who claimed to have been radicalized into wanting to wipe out men. Only men do this. Gah it’s so frustrating how blind men are to each other’s crimes and motivations. Part of me thinks it’s just patriarchal socialization but the cynical side of me says that they all have secret violent thoughts and they empathize with these shooters because the idea of committing mass murder has crossed their mind at one point or another
I would like to see a revival of suffragette level fury at being oppressed via limiting access to contraception / abortion, at least.
I mean even that fury was smashing things/property damage. When did suffragettes go and try to assassinate male politicians? All their “crimes” during protests was low level shit like vandalizing and being loud in public. 100% victimless protest crimes, unlike men who would go out and beat suffragettes while they marched
Yep. And in some cases dying themselves but not like suicide bomber dying.
Like hunger strike / interfering with horseracing deaths.
I think women are more useful to RF NOT dying for the cause, but I'd love to see us a little more vandal-errific for the cause.