4 comments

Apparently these murders happened during a supervised visit and the "other" was the supervisor.

The saddest thing to me is the normality of what happened. It's an extreme version of what plays out over and over again. Lundy Bancroft describes this well on his page about child custody justice:

Our society is currently giving mothers a powerful and crazy-making mixed message. First, it says to mothers, “If your children’s father is violent or abusive to you or to your children, you should leave him in order to keep your children from being exposed to his behavior.” But then, if the mother does leave, the society many times appears to do an abrupt about-face, and say, “Now that you are spilt up from your abusive partner, you must expose your children to him. Only now you must send them alone with him, without you even being around anymore to keep an eye on whether they are okay.”

[Deleted]March 1, 2022

If the child's mother put a restraining order on this male, this means he had violent tendencies. What makes the court think that an unarmed supervisor would be equipped for such a situation and doesn't need security or a police officer to accompany them?

RIP to the girls and the supervisor. The male can roast in hell. Should have just killed himself first

EavaMarch 2, 2022

As long as he's only beaten up their mother, but not the children, judges think it is more important to "foster a relationship" with a battered than to ensure the children are safe. Sometimes grandparents have to fight to keep they daughters' murderers from having visitation with the children.

VestalVirginMarch 1, 2022

Yeah, it's absurd, and I don't know how those responsible sleep at night, or look in the mirror in the mornings

(Not sure if it is a legislation problem, or if judges just make wrong decisions? I suspect, both?)