It's like when men claim that we aren't oppressed because of sex, but also that they are women who experience misogyny. Where does that misogyny come from, hm????
My favorite is when TRAs go out of their way to deny the relevance of biological sex and then have the nerve to add “sexism” to the list of things they actively fight, (right after transphobia, of course). Do they truly not realize their cognitive dissonance or are they fully aware and are just playing virtue-signaling bingo?
It’s like repeatedly kicking someone in the balls and then denying that it must hurt because they are girl balls lol
Women don't have balls, ergo him being kicked in the balls can't hurt. You know, since he is a woman and all.
And when we say we are fighting for sex based rights (or the right not to be kicked), which is what women have been fighting for for centuries, they turn round and say there’s no such thing as “sex based rights” or sex based rights is discriminatory and wrong.
What I want to know is what logic they're using to say sex-based rights are discriminatory and wrong but apparently gender-based rights aren't.
Is enough to make a person feel crazy.
That's the idea; Sew doubt within our minds so we question the very obvious misogyny we continually experience.
Then they say you CAN'T have shins (although you objectively do) because it invalidates them. They are therefore doing nothing wrong, because your shins are a cultural construct that they are kicking, to feel better about themselves at your expense, because you aren't a person, just a vague idea.
Complete DARVO/projection on the gender cult side, since biological sex (the parallel for shins) is actual objective fact and THEIR thing (gender) is the actual social construct.
And then claiming that women are the oppressors when we point out what's going on.
Just like the abusers who turn it around on the victim when the victim draws a boundary