It's so weird that we have testing that can determine the sex of the baby at that gestational age, you know, since they all start as female, you'd think we wouldn't be able to do that.
They can tell from fertilized eggs before they're even implanted. With IVF, it is possible to choose the sex of the baby. I mean, come on...
The people making this joke from my experience have no idea how early embryonic dna testing can happen. They also know very little about human reproduction in general.
I've no idea what the TRAs even think they're achieving with this line. Deliberately misunderstanding the text of the EO so they can all chortle away together at how 'dumb' it is. It's like they're completely divorced from the real world and are just going to exist in a make believe world where they treat their bizarre spin as real.
A lot of leftist arguments are like this. Like, it’s NOT a flex to get overly pedantic about stuff you’re not even right about.
It's like they're completely divorced from the real world and are just going to exist in a make believe world where they treat their bizarre spin as real.
The webcomic SMBC recently had a comic that explained how absurd beliefs were a way people with shitty political opinions signal loyalty to each other - because believing totally absurd things means you cannot be friends with anyone outside your bubble.
That explains a lot.
It's actually a tribal religion thing. People criticize the idea of virgin Mary, so you write a Bull that she was a virgin before, after, and during birth, and ask Peter and Paul to strike down any heretics.
They are doubling down on it. This is a Rolling Stone Headline-It is paywalled so I couldn't read the article but the title shows that's the line they're going to use-my guess that the claim that all fetuses are female (except the EO can use the Y chromosome in it's definition) "Trump’s Trans Ban Defines Everyone as Female — But That’s Not the Problem Rolling Stone Elizabeth Yuko"
I understand why normies my need this explained, but I'm at the point where I don't really even care about reasoning with TRAs because it's pointless. It's never in good faith. They don't actually care about embryos, DSDs, or fetal development. It is and always has been about letting men stomp all over women and children.
Yes. It's about unhindered access to the sexual targets of their choice.
I really hope we're moving to the point, as a society, that we just stop taking them seriously as people.
Even if is based on falsehoods, it is funny how now they’re now saying penis and testes = male human, even though to say that was the most grave transphobic sin a mere day ago. Similarly, TIFs should be seething that they’re being told they were always female. It’s almost like their ideology is logically inconsistent! How are they not embarrassed, jeez.
I've seen variations of this all over my FB in the last day 😵💫 The belief that they are more qualified to understand this issue than a graduate of Harvard law school who served as a legal advisor to the executive branch of the United States is absolutely insane... You'd think the obvious display of male entitlement behind this sentiment would peak some of the handmaidens sharing these memes but alas we aren't so lucky
The belief that they are more qualified to understand this issue than a graduate of Harvard law school who served as a legal advisor to the executive branch of the United States is absolutely insane... You'd think the obvious display of male entitlement behind this sentiment would peak some of the handmaidens sharing these memes but alas we aren't so lucky
Eh, about Harvard law school graduates ... are you sure there are none of those amongst genderists?
I just don't trust official qualifications anymore, not since I learnt that anyone can be insane.
“B-b-but mah nipples!”
And apparently the seam in the ballsack is the remnant of their “original” labia.
Even more amusing: these assertions were coming up in the comments against @fondofbeetles
Awe, gross. I did not need to know about their ballsack.
I said something similar recently on this site. I did some more reading on the topic and I was incorrect. My bad yall.
I saw an even stupider one. They said "if they base it on what gametes you produce, you actually dont produce any gametes until you reach "sexual maturity""
Human females are born with their entire lifetime supply of gametes.
And male children don't have eggs, duh. This is a real third grade argument right here...
Third Grade implies they actually went to school...