8
"Protecting the female participation is a must but we also have to address the fact that there are more transgender individuals who want to practice high-level sport," Parsons told Reuters in an interview.
Fascinating how only female participation is called out here, I wonder why that would be? Why is there no concern about how this will impact male participation? Are we not at all worried about the female transgender individuals who want to practice high-level sport in the men's divisions, and all the many places and medals they are taking away from male athletes? Gosh, why not?
💥 "There should only be one global rule: sports categories are by sex. Period." 💥.
But scrotes claim they have literally changed sex. “I’m a woman, I always was a woman, I’m biologically female, there is nothing that distinguishes me from a cis woman, I am physiologically identical to all women. Now suck my girl dick!”
Archive: https://archive.ph/1cjEC
Each sport must set its own rules on the participation of transgender athletes instead of one global rule and it must be based on scientific data, International Paralympics Committee President Andrew Parsons said on Thursday.
There should only be one global rule: sports categories are by sex. Period.
I wonder if he is saying this to criticize statements made by candidate for IOC President Sebastian Coe. This could be the start of an attempt to bring Coe down.
Speaking on one year ahead of the Milano-Cortina 2026 Paralympic Winter Games, Parsons, who is also an International Olympic Committee member, said any decision should have an inclusive approach.
The Olympics/Paralympics are EXclusive by definition.
Frustrating, but at the same time there are some sports that probably don't need to be separated by sex at all. For example, stationary shooting.
But it is.
And the reason? It used to be mixed sex and then a Chinese woman WON and in short order, sex segregated.
Translation: we're passing the buck. Somebody else deal with this please!!!