80 is a respectable sample size. 8 is not. You can smell the TRAs' desperation, though. They keep trying to pretend like common survey designs are invalid, but only when it's for any study finding that doesn't kiss their asses.
And the 8 includes the researcher doing the study.
Ugh. I bet he identifies as a scientist because he sure as hell isn't one.
Honestly why do people take this unintelligent, pathetic pickmeisha seriously⁉️She’s been accused of blatant antisemitism and written gleefully and publicly about how she wants to get a white man, the latter of which seemed to not matter at all to these SJWs, who’d have tarred and feathered any other woman, of any race, who wrote the same thing! Why hasn’t Ash Sarkar been grilled about her “preference” for white men?? Communist Barbie gets a pass on that, while women who get sexually harassed, coerced and assaulted by men larping as women get shamed, silenced, and threatened with rape and death, in gruesome ways.
And that sample initially included 9 participants- but the "researcher" threw out the results from the TIM whose running times actually improved after he started taking estrogen.
"based on a 'survey' of 80 people"
I don't know about you, but 80 people is a lot of individuals in comparison to 8.
https://twitter.com/AyoCaesar/status/1453101038504906752
This is supposed to be a comeback!
Gender studies majors and queer theorists pretending to gaf about methodological rigor and the finer points of population based statistics is the least expected thing about their reaction
It was a qualitative study and sociology depends on these studies to define concepts and group dynamics. Angela Wild never ever claimed anything else. She a lone lesbian fighting the fucking world took it upon herself to survey her community about violence and their experiences of suffering.
IF ANY OTHER GROUP BESIDES LESBIANS HAD DONE THIS THEY WOULD BE CONSIDERED HEROIC in the social justice community.
I’m so pissed