9
IronicWolfJanuary 21, 2022
Prostate havers can dish it out but they can’t take it.
Reminds me of how one definition of homophobia is men ‘being terrified that gay men will treat and view them as straight men treat women’.
nopenottodayJanuary 21, 2022
Males being unable to handle the way they treat women and demanding to be treated better by the very women they shit on? I don't believe most of the shit that's posted on Reddit but this, this is no doubt 100% true.
Ave_LucifugeJanuary 21, 2022
I bet that didn't have a long shelf life because the mods ejaculating people saw red. Gotta 'shock and awe' these bastards down, ladies.
sojourner_truth_January 21, 2022
I like this. I'll also accept: scrotum bearers, jizzers, or non-women.
They don't even get basic english grammar.
"Birthing people" is present progressive. That means, if you are not currently in progress of actually giving birth, you are not a "birthing person" you can be as pregnant as you want, if you are not actually giving birth at the respective moment, you're not birthing.
Cannot stop laughing. This tool is defending calling women "birthing people" because "Not all people who give birth are women" and then goes on to say this---> https://imgur.com/a/sIL5mtN
Fluffy_genderJanuary 21, 2022
Woman's egg? So transphobic. There are men that have eggs
Exactly! And STOP ERASING NON BINARY EGG-PEOPLE!
CigarsofthepharoahsJanuary 22, 2022
I am the egg man.
I am the walrus.
Sorry, but I just had to do that.
That’s bizarre. But women do also provide DNA. Idk what to make of it
He doesn't think sex is binary, but then says a man and a woman contribute DNA to make a child, thus, proving the binary AND using the "bigoted" man/woman terms he said we shouldn't use. lol
Thank you for explaining bc I am so lost w these folx
For real. We need a genderwoo to sane people translator.
bluetinfoilhatJanuary 21, 2022
Reminds me of men who call women "female" but always call men simply men. When you call them males or anything else than "man" they get upset.
SulphuricMirrorJanuary 22, 2022
That's why I've taken to almost exclusively using "males". It unequivocally includes Tims and it pisses men off. I mostly say women but sometimes there's reason to be explicit that I'm taking about sex-class related issues so I'll say female, as I see other women do. It never feels like the way incels or misogynists use it when women use it, so it doesn't bother me when we do it.
Penis havers, Penis hadders, Penis never hadders
Testicle havers, Testicle hadders, Testicle never hadders
Uterus havers, Uterus hadders, Uterus never hadders
Menstruation havers, Menstruation not yet havers, Menstruation hadders, Menstruation never hadders
...
I hate semen carrying individuals.
Vacatio-LegisJanuary 21, 2022
"Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/AmItheAsshole. Moderators remove posts from feeds for a variety of reasons, including keeping communities safe, civil, and true to their purpose. "
Of course...
Fluffy_genderJanuary 22, 2022
To be honest, the post does sound fake but so do most of the posts on there that never get removed
KWNiteWyvernJanuary 21, 2022
Lol that’s great. I’ve been calling them penis havers lately
bellatrixbellsJanuary 22, 2022
What about those with inverted penises ? Sounds timxclusive.
Has that thread been erased yet? I don't feel like slogging through that sub. LOL
GenderHereticJanuary 22, 2022
Real or fake, I love seeing more and more peaking material for the general public.
[Deleted]January 21, 2022
OP should be more sensitive to those who are more aptly named "pre-ejaculating people". Think that's the source of the frustration :)
Except there ARE plenty of Women who ejaculate. So, although the kidding-on-the-square part definitely still works, tbh the OP is making herself seem ignorant about Female sexuality at the same time.
ED: Hi there haters 😀 Female ejaculate is real. It is not "squirt" nor is it pee. It's actually a milky, thick kind of thing that comes from Skene's gland, which is almost certainly descended from the same undifferentiated predecessor structure in utero as the male prostate gland.
Gladys_KravitzJanuary 21, 2022
It's pee.
Skene's gland isn't the urethra.
I'm NOT talking about "squirt", btw.
I'm planning to go ALL IN on "ejaculating people" in conversation. We'll see how long the enthusiasm for that kind of language lasts. I want the penis people to know that if they want to erase women with "gestators" and "menstruators" and "pregnant people," they'll need to be prepared to have their penises, testicles, and prostates referenced in every single conversation. Penis people who have had their penises removed will be referred to as "formerly bepenised people."
When I call men prostrate havers and ejaculators, my trans right activist friend (who constantly calls women vagina havers, people with cervixes etc) says I'm just being 'mean' to 'make a point'. She hates it, so I keep doing it.
being "mean"??????????????? my god, they are all such self-aware wolves.
It's incredible, she KNOWS not that deep down that calling human beings ejaculators or penis owners is degrading, but she is fine with calling women similar names because I honestly think she doesn't see it as the same kind of affront to their dignity. I think she associates women so strongly with bodily functions, and their role to be kind and effacing to everyone else, that it's right and proper for women to be called vagina owners but cruel to call men prostate possessors.She also gets cross when I call TIMS ejaculators because apparently I'm only doing it to 'make a point'. The reality is she is perfectly content with TIMS and men being called 'women' and 'men', but women being reduced to our body parts.
What the hell is wrong with this woman? Sorry that's your friend and everything but she is fucked up
She just deeply feels like the trans issue is the next big civil rights movement of our time, and she wants to be on the right side of history. She's learned that it's 'kind' to call women vagina owners in order to be inclusive.
If that's the case then why is she bothered by men being called degrading language? I think she's just a straight-up misogynist. Not trying to be rude but the way she's acting is extremely misogynistic.
It is, and she doesn’t seem to realise. But she is a Lib fem through and through.
Well, she's gonna have egg on her face when she finds out which "side" of history (if it can be said to have side) she's really on.
Do you call her out? Ask her to explain her thought process? I can't imagine what she could answer if asked why there's a difference between calling women vagina havers and calling men ejaculators
I did call her out and eventually she admitted that it is weird that only women are reduced to body parts and men aren’t. But then her solution is to normalise using body part language for men as well. She also thinks that using body part language for TIMS is mean because it reminds them of their dicks they don’t want to have, and my response is to shrug and say you can’t call women vagina havers and NOT call TIMS prostate owners. That’s just super unfair and unprincipled. And she went quiet and looked pretty glum. It’s infuriating though because she keeps claiming that one day I’ll see the light and be on the right side of history. I don’t think what I’m saying will ever click with her. It’s really maddening she can’t appreciate why women don’t like being called cervix havers but she has all the empathy in the world for poor TIMS.
Isn't calling women cervix havers mean to the few women who no longer have a cervix due to cervical cancer? I wouldn't want to be reminded of something like that. Or worse, what if whatever is being said is relevant to women without a cervix anyway, but those women self select out (to their detriment)?
It sounds like she is really hurting herself twisting her brain into knots like this to justify her misogyny. I hope she finds peace.
I thought the whole vagina havers nonsense was in order to accommodate TiFs and non binary gender specials. So if anything, this language is made specifically for trans people. Isn't she worried about TiFs getting dysphoric?
She has no empathy for TIFs, who are the supposed reason women are to be referred to as vagina-havers, because it includes them. It's okay and good to remind trans females that they have vaginas and in fact define them that way, but trans males deserve empathy.
[Comment deleted]
But how is it "mean" to be "inclusive?" Hmm...
Omg ew. I hate being called a vagina haver like why boil down my existence to my genitals?
And what point would that be? That it's dehumanizing? Hmm...
I personally like "inseminator" or "inseminating parent".
I prefer the more colloquial "jizzers", myself.
A guy I lived with at uni used to call the TV remote the jizzer. He stopped pretty quickly once we explained to him what the alternative meaning was.
What? Why did he call it that?
Fucking hell 🤣
Lol
Turkey baster parent
Sperm donor.
[Comment deleted]
Well, I was thinking more in the context of fatherhood. If mom is the birthing parent, or birthing body, then dad can be the inseminating body.
They still have their penis, it's turned inside out, so they're still penis people.
Ahem, the politically correct term is "people of penis" ("person of penis" if singular). Thank you very much.
People experiencing penisization
Inverted penis people for srs TiMs :) it’s still a penis, just turned inside out.
Penis people has always been my favorite.
It feels like an old horror movie poster. "Attack of the penis people!"
My favourite is "ball-bearers"
I'm chortling lol
[Comment deleted]