64
EvileineAugust 6, 2024
Don't you just love the pedophilic name of the commenter? Really adds value to his comment.
And they said trans “rights” weren’t anti-woman…
Yet they'll swear up and down that it isn't a men's rights group
lovelaceAugust 6, 2024
If Elon Musk wants to kill Twitter, I wish him the best, I just wish he'd hurry and finish the job
It's the only major social network on which GC speech isn't comprehensively banned and censored. Be careful what You wish for...
NovemberinthechairAugust 6, 2024
These people are dumber than a box of hair.
If anyone calls me a non man in real life I'll loose it.
BlukBerryAugust 7, 2024
Imagine applying this semantic 'logic' to any other group of people. Imagine calling Black people 'non-white', or Muslims 'non-Christian'.
These same people would quite rightly be angry about that, but why not this, too? It's the same principle, isn't it? Defining members of a group by their not being a member of a dominant group (in places like the UK and US)?
Misogyny all the way down.
“Non-man” as if men are the default and women are just some cast off group on the side.
It would be actually more scientifically accurate to refer to the 2 sexes as women and non women since women are the default and more important in every way measurable. It's biologically speaking pretty significant to know if you're talking about a woman when it comes to stuff like reproduction, but physical labor and advances in science can be carried out by both sexes. There's nothing special that the non women have to offer so that's why they project so hard.
No?
If this is referring to the whole "everyone starts out female", everyone starts out undifferentiated, not female