18
BlackCirceFebruary 1, 2024
Dr Murphy, who is a board-certified integrative medicine physician and sexologist
Sexology will never beat the allegations
OxyToxinFebruary 2, 2024
A fox opened a fried chicken restaurant that doesn't serve chicken...but even if it did, he wouldn't eat there.
oowooFebruary 2, 2024
Notice that the 28 year old baby they chose to upload has her legs covered in self harm scars.
ReliquiaFebruary 1, 2024
Are there even enough people interested in this for it to be profitable?
PatitaGrisFebruary 2, 2024
It looks incredible in a small town.
WrennFebruary 2, 2024
I believe that’s by design. Being in such a small town allows for almost guaranteed anonymity for those flying in. Kind of like getting plastic surgery at an exclusive private island resort.
[Deleted]February 1, 2024
Its gross but hey at least theyre going to a designated place for this and paying instead of expecting the closest woman to baby them for free /j
Women1stFebruary 2, 2024
JFS. Has “Dr” Murphy actually met these sick f****?
BlackCirceFebruary 2, 2024
Yeah. She clearly knows that catering to male sexual depravity is a lucrative profession
SamhainFebruary 2, 2024
To answer your question, here’s her bio:
I am a LGBQTIA+, Kink+, Sex+ therapist. I specialize in helping those walking their own path including consensual non-monogamous relationships (such as polyamorous, open relationships, swingers, etc.), LGBTQ+, KINK, BDSM, sex/erotic workers,
"I'm a pervert who went to medical school"
PointerFebruary 1, 2024
I respect the effort to help people work through their early childhood trauma, which is a really hard problem to address. I would think, however, that this therapy could be retraumatizing unless done extremely carefully. An online session in particular seems like it could be really hard for a baby alter, because babies process the world through touch. But also, babies just need a steady caregiver day after day, morning to night. I don't know. I just think you have to be super careful psychologically with the baby stuff.
[Deleted]February 2, 2024
NOFebruary 1, 2024
I mean... if it's between consenting adults, who am I to judge.
This is weird but I'm not going to tell someone they can't do that because it makes me uncomfy... I'm not involved.
KiobiaFebruary 2, 2024
The thing is though, and I'm prepared to be downvoted for this, but why do we have to be open and accepting of all these kinks, even when it's between consenting people? Sorry, diaper fetishes, scat are gross, but so are a lot of things that point has normalised in the past decade.
Sure, in theory it's none of my business what people do behind closed doors, but imo it's this acceptance (and this stupid, infantile phrase 'Don’t yuck someone's yum') that we're seeing more and more of this stuff being pushed out into the open. No, we don't need to see grown men wearing diapers in public. No, the collar with the tag having your master's name isn't something I want to lay eyes on my commute.
People can have the sex and jerk off to whatever they want, I can't stop that, but I do think the flaunting of one's sexual preferences (and here I'm obviously not talking about a little PDA between couples) is just making the ridiculous focus sex and sexuality our society has developed, where everyone puts their sexual micro lables on their social media and claims they are queer because being straight is oh so boring, worse.
Kink shaming is my kink and I'll never be accepting of gross shit like that.
NOFebruary 2, 2024
It's more about not controlling other people's actions when it doesn't cause harm.
CriminallyCriticalFebruary 3, 2024
Accepting men indulging in a baby fetish does promote harm. Fetishes like this act as addictions. One day, it won’t be enough to get that high. What will he do then?
NOFebruary 3, 2024
And that's where I draw the line. You no hurty other people: ok
You hurty other people: not ok
I think it could be argued that being accepting of this shit is harmful to society. This is just one place in a small town, but a lot of things start out small and then turn into something much bigger.
If we accept this now, in ten, twenty years, will these places be in big cities? In malls? Where does it end?
DoomedSibylFebruary 3, 2024
It seems the slippery slope argument has some merit when it came to changing sexual norms and standards of behavior.
Men have benefited by having every depraved fetish normalized and served. Women are degraded and suffering. The global sex trade is bigger than ever. Even “privileged” women are expected to embrace their own degradation and humiliation because acts that used to be far outside the norm are now expected.
Worse, the backlash isn’t going to take us back to sanity, it’s going to take us back to repressive puritanism that disproportionately punishes women. As for the standard live and let live line and consenting adults and behind closed doors (and I’ve said all of these things in years past) are these things really harmless? I’m struggling to think of a kink, fetish or paraphilia that isn’t about degrading and harming one partner for the power and pleasure of the other partner. How harmless is that really?
This. Also, I think sex is such a powerful driver for male behavior (and to a certain extent female behavior) that being very careful about what we adopt as norms around sex is imperative for safeguarding women and children.
Robustly supporting freedom of speech and expression for all (including and perhaps especially for those we disagree with)? Absolutely. But that doesn't mean our brains have to herniate out of our asses and we can't critique what is happening. Our speech shouldn't be silenced in the name of tolerance (also, hi liberal feminism! Thanks for all of the good you've done us /s). We can and should voice our opinions.
NOFebruary 3, 2024
I wouldn't care as long as I don't see or participate.
Between consenting adults is fine, involving others is not.
SamhainFebruary 2, 2024
There’s a little more to this story that’s not in the article. The spa would be operated out of a house in a residential part of the town and the original website for the spa advertised field trips to the local playground and nearby walking trail. The local parents are not happy.
Okay, this makes it a million times worse. But can't say I'm surprised. People don't take men at their word (or more importantly, ascribe men's motivations in accordance with their actions) enough. Men's sexual interests, when on display, aren't some grand metaphor or deep psychological mystery. When creeps want to roleplay as a baby, a not so insignificant number of them want to sexually abuse a baby. This should be "no shit, Sherlock!" knowledge by now, but somehow we have to pretend it's not.
[Deleted]February 2, 2024
NOFebruary 2, 2024
That part is gross. Don't involve others, build your own playground on your own property and play there but stay away from kids
SnowWhiteFebruary 1, 2024
is it consent if it's the only job you're able to get and really need the money in order to pay for medical bills so you don't die? You can't put a price on a human, ever.
VestalVirginFebruary 2, 2024
To be fair, I don't think this is the kind of prostitution done by women who have no other choice, financially. Are many coerced into it by their male partners? Probably. But I don't think it is done by those who can't do anything else.
There's simply too much effort involved.
Doesn't mean I approve of it - I think we should be extremely wary of men (and the occasional woman) who have sexual fetishes associated with children, and not encourage them to indulge in those.
PatitaGrisFebruary 2, 2024
That logic can be applied to any physical menial work, most people don't work by the mere happiness of useful activities but because the consequences of not having money, and there is very little to do about that until humankind figure some form of universal income. Of course I understand that prostitution is a whole different set because "sex work" is in fact paid rape, but we don't know if the place is a sort of brothel. If there is really no sex involved as they claim, is not that different of a authentic, bona fide spa with extra socialization.
WrennFebruary 2, 2024
Are you honestly saying that changing an adult males diaper, who has an erection and will possibly ejaculate on you, is the same as menial labor? By that logic, being a clothed dominatrix would be the same, because there’s no penetration/traditional sex acts. So is that not “sex work” either?
It says “no sex” on the website because prostitution and brothels are illegal in NH. But you can be 100% sure this is a fetish fulfillment center. Almost definitely with “actual” prostitution and pornography production services.
Yeah, this is about on the level of being a clothed dominatrix. Which is very different from other kinds of prostitution, and a lot safer for the body, but according to one woman who did both, the dominatrix thing was even worse because she'd have to think about what the men wanted, and that was on some level even more disgusting than just dissociating from her body while the men raped her. (Of course, someone who cannot dissociate from her body might see that very differently.)
[Deleted]February 2, 2024
PhryneFebruary 2, 2024
"No sex involved, they claim." Depends on how you define "sex." I worked day in, day out at an establishment where no sex was involved, just the other stuff. No hjs, no bjs. no piv or pia. These acts are generally taken to be "sex acts" and we didn't do them, no sirree, No sex available, hand on heart. But, and here's the thing, the other stuff was very sexual indeed to the men who were paying for their pet kink.
Everyone else is so much more accepting than me. I think it's nasty and pervy and encourages something extremely unhealthy and disgusting and I'm with team "No freaking way, you filthy weirdos." The doctor/sexologist insists that it won't be sexual; but of course it would be, since acting and being treated like a baby is their turn on. It's not therapy, it's kink. And I would direct anyone who disagrees attention to the horrible scars on the diaper girl's arms and legs. It's not healthy, she's not healthy and indulging in sexualized magical thinking isn't going to help her. She's feeding the wrong wolf.
I remember seeing a husband and wife who ran an adult baby service like this. They said some of the men would get erections during changing but they just ignore and work around them. I have no doubt that’s a lie, I don’t believe someone pervy enough to want to change the soiled diapers of adult men wouldn’t also have an upcharge for happy endings. Of course you can’t advertise that or it’s prostitution. But you don’t offer to wipe the genitals of a man with a fetish without also expecting ejaculation to be involved.
If it were genuine therapy, I don't see why it would need to be adults only, and the 'menu' of services does not sound at all like therapy. This looks a lot closer to the businesses operating as 'massage parlours' to me. And I'm with you on not seeing that kink as acceptable. Conditioning oneself to associate children's items/experience/behaviour with arousal is not ok.
Agreed.