In a New York Times article Is a Women’s Museum Still Relevant? written by Mr. Kriston Capps a quote by Susan Fisher Sterling, the Museum's director is included:

People in the art world always think we’re achieving parity faster than we are,” Sterling said. “We’re not even close to there, if 89 percent of acquisitions are men’s work.

The museum was being renovated and will reopen at the end of October Hopefully it will stay open. It's a Woman's museum after all.

The article made me wonder how transgender identifying people are faring in the artworld. Obviously they achieve notoriety more easily than "CIS" artists. While articles in the NYTimes like this about possibly closing the Nat. Museum of Women in the Arts subtley diss women's art, the lack of creativity in the arts in today's world is decried in other articles Why Culture has Come to a Standstill

A recent Canadian Survey of nonbinary and transgender identifying artists shows that many gravitate to the arts. So far the National Museum of Women in the Arts has not displayed works by transgender indentifying men but will that be changing? It seems like the pressure may be on.

*Is a Women’s Museum Still Relevant? *https://archive.ph/0SVLI#selection-345.0-345.35

Why Culture Has Come to a Standstill https://archive.ph/QZTjr#selection-319.0-319.36

First ever census data on transgender and non-binary artists and workers in the arts, culture, and heritage https://statsinsights.hillstrategies.com/p/transgender-nonbinary-artists-cultural-workers