She is polarising, I'm not on board with everything she says, but there are some gems in this interview.
“I am very suspicious of this whole pose of guilt,” she says, explaining that it’s usually used by white people to “assert superiority over other white people”...... “Real guilt is a terrible sensation. It is not something that you parade, shame. That is not what these people are experiencing. It’s proud guilt. It’s used to shut people up, to essentially deprive you of your right to free speech".
Things start falling apart because functionality no longer matters; all that matters is ideology. And that’s what we’re dealing with right now. You’re watching grand storied universities destroy themselves because they no longer believe in themselves, they don’t believe in the canon they’re supposed to be transferring to the next generation.” The students now have the power, she says. “It was bad enough that the universities had converted into supermarkets, which were offering products. But the administration and faculty are now terrified of their own student bodies.”
Cancel culture, Shriver believes, “is getting worse... there’s nothing moderate about it. It’s aggressive, hostile, angry, deliberately disruptive, vengeful, perhaps vengeful above all... it’s about hunting people’s careers for sport.” The goal, she says, “is to utterly destroy you. And that is the appeal of this stuff – that satisfaction of destroying other people’s lives. And also, in doing so, you don’t have to take any responsibility for being a destructive force. You are the force of righteousness.”
I agree. I think there is structural racism in the society I live in and just blatant racism between individuals. Same with sexism. But I think these are both much more complex than dividing people into good guys and bad guys, incapable of nuance or change.
If kids were given a decent education in terms of world history, geography and critical thinking, most would come to their own opinions about global dynamics, with the benefit of diversity and debate that would allow us to actually change society. But of course that would also involve discussion of class and that is the main thing that elites want to avoid.
It’s easy to imagine the mental parity world she describes. At my workplace we are not allowed to use the phrases “white glove treatment” or “blackout period” for example despite these having precisely zero to do with race.
At my workplace we are not allowed to use the phrases “white glove treatment” or “blackout period” for example despite these having precisely zero to do with race.>
See, now this is the kind of condescension that is emblematic of our current moment. It does nothing, nothing to address racism but jars and divides people while supposedly showing a superiority of perception. It’s not only that it’s all surface and no substance, though that would be bad enough, it’s actively doing the opposite of what it purports.
This circle is for discussing books of any kind, regardless of genre or subject. Share a book you’ve recently read, request recommendations, post articles about books or authors, share photos of your bookshelves.
Our goal is to encourage reading books of all kinds, and to be a place for open and civil discussion about any book or author. Whether you read occasionally or every day, whatever your reading tastes and opinions, we hope you will join in and support other members.
Use the appropriate flair (post and add afterwards) and use the NSFW option if applicable. No books are prohibited here, but please be mindful of the Ovarit Sitewide Rules when discussing challenging or controversial content.
If your post reveals details of the plot of a recently published book, consider adding “Spoilers” to the subject and in your post. Spoilers aren’t required for older books or very well-known by most people.
If you want to discuss feminist books, please visit /o/FeministBooks.
Rules
Posts and comments should be about books, authors, or related topics.
Be civil. Rude behavior, insults, name-calling, etc. will not be tolerated.
She is polarising, I'm not on board with everything she says, but there are some gems in this interview.
“I am very suspicious of this whole pose of guilt,” she says, explaining that it’s usually used by white people to “assert superiority over other white people”...... “Real guilt is a terrible sensation. It is not something that you parade, shame. That is not what these people are experiencing. It’s proud guilt. It’s used to shut people up, to essentially deprive you of your right to free speech".
Things start falling apart because functionality no longer matters; all that matters is ideology. And that’s what we’re dealing with right now. You’re watching grand storied universities destroy themselves because they no longer believe in themselves, they don’t believe in the canon they’re supposed to be transferring to the next generation.” The students now have the power, she says. “It was bad enough that the universities had converted into supermarkets, which were offering products. But the administration and faculty are now terrified of their own student bodies.”
Cancel culture, Shriver believes, “is getting worse... there’s nothing moderate about it. It’s aggressive, hostile, angry, deliberately disruptive, vengeful, perhaps vengeful above all... it’s about hunting people’s careers for sport.” The goal, she says, “is to utterly destroy you. And that is the appeal of this stuff – that satisfaction of destroying other people’s lives. And also, in doing so, you don’t have to take any responsibility for being a destructive force. You are the force of righteousness.”
I agree. I think there is structural racism in the society I live in and just blatant racism between individuals. Same with sexism. But I think these are both much more complex than dividing people into good guys and bad guys, incapable of nuance or change.
If kids were given a decent education in terms of world history, geography and critical thinking, most would come to their own opinions about global dynamics, with the benefit of diversity and debate that would allow us to actually change society. But of course that would also involve discussion of class and that is the main thing that elites want to avoid.
It’s easy to imagine the mental parity world she describes. At my workplace we are not allowed to use the phrases “white glove treatment” or “blackout period” for example despite these having precisely zero to do with race.
See, now this is the kind of condescension that is emblematic of our current moment. It does nothing, nothing to address racism but jars and divides people while supposedly showing a superiority of perception. It’s not only that it’s all surface and no substance, though that would be bad enough, it’s actively doing the opposite of what it purports.