16
Circle to post research studies
I’ve gone down this rabbit hole and tend to go through journals for new transgender related studies. I’ve found a bunch of things I think are worth sharing (won’t share the whole paper - just screenshots of findings that stand out and the DOI link to the study, and a link to download it if it is open access.
It could also be a place to share surveys and statistics, as long as a source is provided to back it up.
The idea is to have a place where women can search for official and published stats and research studies under tags like dysphoria, childhood dysphoria, AGP, other paraphilias, sex differences, surveys etc.
Do they just throw words together? Do they never bother with definitions at all?
I think it is that. Cut a few words out of a genetics textbook, but in a hat and shake.
Yes, that's exactly what they do to try and seem smart in any way. When anything this person says still amounts to two sexes.
So they're saying because of genetic diversity, and the fact that no two individual gametes contain all the same mix of genetic material, the categories of egg and sperm cease to exist. Right. Sigh.
This is why men constantly give birth to YY babies. When two sperms meet, one fertilizes the other and causes the man to become pregnant and give birth.
Love your username
Thank you!
I also came up with the name for the website. Not to brag or anything…
Teach us mere mortals your great naming skills oh wise one.
My original flair on /r/GC was, in fact, "Captain AFAB hunting the White Male".
How do I give kudos to this beautiful Mpreg fanfic? LMAO
I guess this is the 4th grade biology we never understood
Saw this one on Twitter. I swear DrEm (FondOfBeetles, i think) has the patience of a saint. And she's hilarious. For those who didnt see: its in answer to someone responding to Dawkins' infamous Tweet comparing trans and Dolezal. I do have to say that im genuinely worried about the education these people have. It looks like they genuinely believe total nonsense. Its like arguing with flat Earthers.
Did they really try to argue with Dawkins, a very well known biologist, with that silly word soup? The audacity!
This reminds me of the new atheist involvement in the evolution/creationism "debate." Same shit, different decade.
Do they make this shit up as they go along, or is there some bullshittery 101 text book they’re all pulling from?
[Comment deleted]
There are many alleles too, so I think the next step is to question how do we know we are even human?