88
Women-Only Naked Spa Lacks Constitutional Right to Exclude Transgender Patrons with Pensises
Posted June 7, 2023 by HildegardVonBees in GenderCritical

https://reason.com/volokh/2023/06/06/women-only-naked-spa-lacks-constitutional-right-to-exclude-transgender-patrons-with-pensises/

https://archive.ph/znVUB

Could someone please explain this judgment? I am not a lawyer, but it seems like this judgment is a real problem for women.

The plaintiffs couldn’t win based on freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or freedom of association.

Instead, they lost because they are discriminating against a certain type of male (TIM).

The judgment refers to exclusion based on sexual orientation and race, which of course are both illegal. It implies that not allowing men in the women’s spa is analogous to having a “Whites Only” sign displayed.

Do women not have any legal right at all to not be forced to be in the presence of a be-penised male? Isn’t that discriminating against women?

No comments