48

I saw a clip on Twitter of the segment. Tucker showed pix of that walrus Chris Chan, called him HE, and then let Kara Dansky talk about men harming women in prison right now. He thinks the court should step in.

I don't have the clip. Does someone have it to post? Sorry to post with no link.

I read the state of Virginia has folded and is calling him HE and putting him in men's jail! GOOD NEWS.

I saw a clip on Twitter of the segment. Tucker showed pix of that walrus Chris Chan, called him HE, and then let Kara Dansky talk about men harming women in prison right now. He thinks the court should step in. I don't have the clip. Does someone have it to post? Sorry to post with no link. I read the state of Virginia has folded and is calling him HE and putting him in men's jail! GOOD NEWS.

57 comments

The fact that Kara has to appear on Tucker Carlson's show on Fox in order to talk about Chris Chan or the horror of trans-identified males being housed in women's prisons....makes my blood boil...the fact that none of the major liberal mainstream tv companies invited her on makes me sick.

Yes! it shows how complete the media blackout is. This is how lefties end up thinking it's all a hoax and we're all crazy.

The dangers of tribalism.

I think VA’s laws about TiMs in women’s prison is that they must have had SRS surgery, which CWC apparently has not (DIY efforts not withstanding). So specifically, no penises allowed in womens’ prisons

[–] wilmas 25 points Edited

Barring keeping biological men completely out that would be the best solution.

Fuck Tucker Carlson, though.

Broken clock, twice a day 🤢

I respect the hell out of Kara for being able to stomach him

Yes, fuck that one guy in MSM that will show the truth about horrible men in women's prisons, amirite?

I mean realistically it doesn’t offset how much harm he does the rest of the time. He’s a trust fund kid who plays a buffoon on tv to sell self-sabotaging policies (that benefit the rich) to a right-wing audience and he invites people like Kara Dansky because there’s an opportunity to emphasize the depravity of the left (knowing his audience won’t count that people like her are also coming from the left and are against it). He doesn’t care about women’s rights, he’s 100% in this for the kind of partisan tug of war that helped create the environment where this is happening.

I am grateful for any chance for Kara Dansky to reach a bigger audience but Tucker Carlson isn’t even close to being redeemed by it. He’s still one of the most harmful media figures in the US at the moment, overall.

Yes. He’s a borderline fash and clearly isn’t doing it for the right reasons.

"Borderline fash"? No he's not, not at all. Complete nonsense. And he may not be doing it for the right reasons (who knows), but at least he's doing it, unlike CNN, MSNBC, and all of the others "non-fash" networks.

[–] TallHelena 15 points Edited

While I disapprove of Chris Chan's "transgenderism", I do so for a totally different reason than Tucker does.

I think that for Tucker, Chan is a man who dares to dress like a woman, which is an insult to men.

Whereas for me, Chan is a man who gets sexually turned on by being dressed like a woman, which is an insult to women.

Just a question, why do you call him "Chan"? His surname is Chandler, "Chris-Chan" is just a nickname, isn't it?

I'm not trying to be malicious, just wondering if there's something I missed as I've only seen him being referred to simply as "Chan" here on Ovarit...

He’s long been known as “Chris Chan” on the internet. But yes, I find it really annoying. Internet is one thing but I’ve seen MSM doing this too. Not only are they using female pronouns for a man, but they’re also using his internet nickname Chan in place of his actual surname Chandler.

“Ms. Chan” sounds like they’re reporting about an Asian woman when it’s actually a white man. -_-

[–] Susurro 1 points Edited

"Ms. Chan” sounds like they’re reporting about an Asian woman when it’s actually a white man.

Yeah that's why I'm questioning everyone just calling him "Chan" as if it's a last name and not part of "Chris-Chan" 😂

Edit: I'm talking about usage like this, from the original comment:

I think that for Tucker, Chan is a man who dares to dress like a woman...

I think it may be due to an online handle by which most of us might already know him?

I mean I didn't know him before his crimes came to light but he is listed as Christine/Chris Chan on tvtropes.

[–] Susurro 3 points Edited

I understand that. I guess I'm I'm just used to him being Chris or Chris-Chan, not just "Chan", since I've been following this particular train wreck for over a decade 😂

I just searched his (Chan's) name because apparently he admitted recently he had sex with his mom. It's maybe one of those they don't deserve their preferred pronouns when they are criminals justification.

It's so horrifying. I don't understand how someone could do that to their own mother. When I think about it, it makes me nauseous.

Raped. She has dementia.

I'm not sure he has the mental capacity either. I suspect it's a lie anyway. The woman asking him was Isabelle Janke allegedly. A 20 year old, so I don't believe she should be treated as a fully culpable adult either. She's got a known incest fetish (at her age she was likely groomed), so likely Chan was trying to score some points with her in that regard.

Why would you ever doubt that a man who admitted to raping his dementia stricken mother is telling the truth? From the videos that he took of her over the years it’s obvious that he was verbally, emotionally, and most likely physically abusing his mother. Why is it so hard to believe that a mentally disturbed man who spent his entire adult life obsessing over finding a girlfriend to have sex with and repeatedly failing would not rape his mother who couldn’t fight back? That girl on the phone is a psycho but you can’t seriously believe after listening to that phone call that he didn’t rape his mom.