105

What kind of fuckery is this?! I really can’t stand how dishonest they are. GC on Twitter have been saying the Taliban targeting women and girls is an example of sex based oppression and what do TRAs do??? Claim the Taliban are gender critical or that GCs are siding with the Taliban because the Taliban only recognize biological females as women and girls. The way they twist things like this really is scary as fuck.

What kind of fuckery is this?! I really can’t stand how dishonest they are. GC on Twitter have been saying the Taliban targeting women and girls is an example of sex based oppression and what do TRAs do??? Claim the Taliban are gender critical or that GCs are siding with the Taliban because the Taliban only recognize biological females as women and girls. The way they twist things like this really is scary as fuck.

48 comments

[+] [Deleted] 79 points

Is this part of sissy porn men's humiliation fantasy, to be enslaved by the Taliban?

These men are so overly vocal. I like to think they are FEW in number, just so in your face that it seems like more.

They've reached the point of "how come she got gang raped and acid thrown in her face and I didn't? Don't they see ME as a woman too?" That is fucked up. That is the definition of fucked up.

Can we airlift them all to Afghanistan to experience it for themselves? 😁

Where are those pics of men who very obviously have a sissy fetish who have converted to islam and talk about being dominated?

Our oppression is their fetish

I'm not telling people what to say or not say, but sometimes you don't have to say every dumb thing that pops into your head!

How transphobic of the Taliban only wanting to enslave and rape biological females!
Again showing that the TIMs can't handle anything not being about them.

Did you know that GCers acknowledging that only female people are raped by the Taliban means we support their sexism? If you really cared about those AFABs, you would stop pointing out that they’re being chosen for abuse based on their sex, and start respecting their gender identities! The real crime committed by the Taliban, clearly, was reducing them to their body parts by recognizing their femaleness—wait, did someone say that you can simultaneously recognize that someone is female while respecting them as a person? And that, in fact, the only way to fix oppression is to acknowledge its actual basis, rather than substituting some red herring? No way.

At this point it's possible that flat earthers have a better grasp of reality and history than those nutjobs

Yup. I mean, ok, photography can be faked, and always has been because people love a good joke. TRAs think DNA can be changed with hormones and radical feminism is in line with radicals Islam. I'll take a flat earther any day.

… I wonder if gender-critical means anything to them? What really gets me is their implication that acknowledging sex = perpetuating sexism, like the only way to prevent sexism is to conceal sex, rather than accept that sex-based oppression exists and work towards a world where people can simultaneously acknowledge sex and not oppress someone based on it. Like, “You called that person female? Obviously you meant to dehumanize her, because that’s how I see it! There’s no reason why you would call someone female unless you wanted to use her body, because that’s how it works for me”. It also sets up a situation where being acknowledged as female is an invitation to being abused, since there’s apparently no way a female person can address her sex without wanting to be subject to sexism. In that way, they’re closer to conservatism than a GCer could ever be, since they’re the ones who imply that acknowledging sexism somehow perpetuates it. Someone ought to pull up that infographic with the differences between TRAs, GCers, and conservatives: accepting gender while rejecting sex, accepting sex while rejecting gender, and accepting sex as well as gender.

… I wonder if gender-critical means anything to them? What really gets me is their implication that acknowledging sex = perpetuating sexism

They really think this. A guy on the old GCdebatesQT subreddit told me that it was sexist to say men and women look different from one another.

These idiots clearly don't understand words. I'm starting to wonder if they have some kind of damage to the part of the brain that processes language.

It’s really this. They really think if we just all pretend not to see sex than sexism can’t happen. That isn’t how it works at all, in fact that’s a way to make sexism thrive.

Whenever I think they hit the lowest of the lows, they prove that they can go further down.

It's so stupid it would be hilarious if the situation wasn't this serious.

It’s true, the Taliban fighters are all GC. For their book club Akhundzada chose they read Irreversable Damage, that actually is why they decided to capture Kabul - they were concerned about possible Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria among Afghani girls and young women in the capital. Abigail Shrier has blood on her hands

It's like the Eric Andre meme:

The Taliban target women and girls in Afghanistan

TRAs: How could the TERFS do this?

... like violent Islamic theocrats have more in common with radical feminists than sexist males, yeah right.

They missed the part where we fight against sex-based oppression, and they don’t. (“They” is deliberately vague—could it be the Taliban, or them? Who knows, haha :,) ).

“They” is deliberately vague—could it be the Taliban, or them? Who knows, haha :,)

Haha, I like your style!

What the FUCK. Are they wahing about how those Afghan women are so privileged to be locked in their homes and married off to men five times their age because transphobia?

Load more (18 comments)