14 comments

legopantsMarch 18, 2025(Edited March 18, 2025)

This was what women fought hundreds of years to achieve.

Men ruined it in less than a single generation

And I'm supposed to be happy or praise the states who ONLY NOW are backpedaling now that less and less support is there? Now that the world is very slightly less batshit about trans lunacy, now that people want to be on the majority/"good guys" side, they go back on the bullshit and harm caused to women and girls for years. Yeah, give me a fucking break. Congrats - you did nothing at all, not even the bare minimum. You revoked women's rights then returned them like some sort of savior of women worldwide? Lmfao fuck off .

I won't be grateful for this, I'll be furious it ever changed in the first place, that men were allowed to define MY SEX and my entire existence in law based on their own MALE feelings, when other women couldn't even fucking do it without fighting for centuries based on our fucking lived reality and physical existence

LadyCardTraderMarch 18, 2025

I stg males are the biggest time suck on the planet. I actually encourage the Mars exploration or whatever it is.

DurableBookMarch 19, 2025(Edited March 19, 2025)

I stg males are the biggest time suck on the planet.

I need a word. "The laugh one ~~omits ~~ EMITS when someone perfectly captures a feeling of rage that you realize you have been experiencing for a long time."

CattitudeMarch 19, 2025

Omits or emits?

DurableBookMarch 19, 2025

Doh. Posting before coffee claims another one...

CattitudeMarch 19, 2025

I know what you mean, I've already been editing because of posting before breakfast! 😆

HareMarch 18, 2025

They were also the first state to allow women to vote (bc there were like 20 people, but still).

MisfitMarch 18, 2025

Keep posting good news! I needed something positive to boost my mood today. Thank you!

PinkPeoniesInTheRainMarch 18, 2025

Lucky #13! Here's to 37 (+ 1 District) more! 👍

CrystalLatticeMarch 19, 2025

This is good and all, but red states are really only defining "woman" so they can more precisely target their misogyny.

wearexxMarch 19, 2025(Edited March 19, 2025)

I don't think anyone has problems with targeting misogyny. Blue states did it just fine without the definition. Red/blue they all know who a woman is.

rkinMarch 19, 2025

Probably. Still, a democratic lawyer now can't saw woman is a 'biological' term she can't define if asked to define it as its legal definition.

TerfisnotadirtywordMarch 18, 2025

I hope we start doing this in Australia. Our former prime minister Julia Gillard muddied the definition of sex and gender and it's caused us many problems since then by allowing men who have "transitioned" to claim sex based women's rights

WatcherattheGatesMarch 18, 2025

Such great news!!