76
- all
- new
- |
- Activism
- Announcements
- Books
- Cancelled
- FeministBooks
- FeministEvents
- FeministVideos
- Games
- GenderCritical
- GoodNewsForWomen
- Movies
- Ovarit
- Radfemmery
- SaveWomensSports
- STEM
- Television
- TerfIsASlur
- WomensHistory
- WomensLiberation
More
You are viewing a single comment thread. Show all comments.
Posted September 27, 2024 by Women2Women
Score: 76
Need a break from all the depressing things about being a woman in this world? This circle is for you!
This circle is for celebrating all the good news relating to women's interests (and by all, we mean ALL, even the things you might disagree with, e.g. achievements or advancements for women in the military, business, religion, etc.)
Rules:
-
Relevance: Women should be the primary focus. Posts about men being held accountable, found guilty of crimes, etc. are NOT appropriate for this circle.
-
Formatting: Posts should be actual news, preferably in the form of an article or from an official news source. Do not edit the headline of linked articles; if you would like to provide additional commentary, please do so in a comment.
-
Civility: Keep discussions on topic. Do not denigrate the achievements or advancements of women.
-
Promoting Infighting or Drama: Do not start or perpetuate infighting or drama. Disagreements must be civil and must be about the CONTENT of the post, not about the poster, other commenters, the site, etc.
The Sitewide Rules and Sitewide Guidelines are both enforced here.
Moderators
© Ovarit LLC
About Ovarit | Rules | Guidelines | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Bugs | License
“All space becomes male space unless females maintain a concerted effort to mark a space for themselves.” –Sheila Jeffreys
About Ovarit | Rules | Guidelines | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Bugs | License
“All space becomes male space unless females maintain a concerted effort to mark a space for themselves.” –Sheila Jeffreys
Could this have an influence on Sall Grover’s appeal? This is a large precedent set for excluding men on the basis that women are disadvantaged.
I suspect they'll say that TIMs are somehow disadvantaged compared to women and end it right there. Wonder if these ideologically captured courts would allow sexual violence and crime stats to be used as evidence of the need for single sex spaces.
Thats not relevant. Being 'more disadvantaged' doesnt grant you access. People with disabilities dont have the right to take over spaces for ethnic minorities.
The argument, i think, is that the law has already legally recognised tickle as a female. In reality he isnt, but the law has to agree with itself.