Is it bad that I kind of love that the author takes a swipe at the overly PC writer who refuses to name women in a book on women and drinking? The reviewer correctly notes that “none of the societies surveyed had any trouble telling a woman from a man.” I think I like the review better than the actual book because reading “all genders” for women would annoy me inside of a chapter.
This circle is for discussing anything and everything relating to women's history, even if it's not explicitly feminist.
Rules:
Formatting: Do not edit the headline of a linked article. If you would like to provide commentary on an article and/or why you posted it, please do so in a comment.
Relevance: Women's issues must be the primary focus.
Promoting Infighting or Drama: Do not start or perpetuate infighting or drama. Disagreements must be civil and must be about the CONTENT of the post, not about the poster, other commenters, the site, etc.
Is it bad that I kind of love that the author takes a swipe at the overly PC writer who refuses to name women in a book on women and drinking? The reviewer correctly notes that “none of the societies surveyed had any trouble telling a woman from a man.” I think I like the review better than the actual book because reading “all genders” for women would annoy me inside of a chapter.