17 comments

VestalVirginFebruary 25, 2025

Woah. The backlash against feminism really is in full swing on both sides of the political spectrum. The misogyny is insane!

Hope the pendulum swings in the other direction again really, really, really soon.

AmareldysFebruary 25, 2025

This needs to be challenged on constitutional grounds, interstate travel or business or something like that.

LillithFebruary 26, 2025

If it reaches SCOTUS, what do you think they would say

DBrookeFebruary 26, 2025

Thanks a bunch, Trump voters.

AmareldysFebruary 26, 2025

I think it will be hard for them, because they say they are all about the constitutional and these laws clearly violate that, but at the same time they are anti abortion. I could see them saying abortion is unconstitutional and upholding a nationwide ban... but for the travel laws I am not so sure.

LillithFebruary 26, 2025

Thanks for responding.

The current SCOTUS is conservative and conservatives are all about curtailing women. Our constitution was not written by men who valued womens ability to freely travel. I can easily see the court saying that a baby's right to life trumps a woman's desire to spread her legs without consequences (or some other conservative platitude).

These same justices want to revisit gay marriage. Im not optimistic.

RappaccinisDaughterFebruary 26, 2025

"something something states rights, we don't give a shit"

LillithFebruary 26, 2025

Yes!

LillithFebruary 26, 2025

Why should we have to obey this law? Cant we just call it "waste, fraud, and abuse" and do as we please?

inTERFerenceFebruary 25, 2025

And here I was hopeful from the title that they wanted to ban surrogacy, which is human trafficking. But of course it’s about forcing women to stay with their abusers.

CattitudeFebruary 25, 2025

That was my first thought.

notapatsyFebruary 25, 2025

Why does she use that execrable phrase "pregnant people."

EstelleFebruary 26, 2025

Because she did. Any thoughts on the actual topic of the post? Seems like a pretty dangerous proposal for women, restricting their freedom to travel while pregnant.

notapatsyFebruary 26, 2025

Here's why I said what I did: she has written an article detailing how Republicans in Montana and elswehere are working to restrict women's movements across state lines, which should alarm every woman no matter their politics, yet at the same time she uses the language of those who erase women. That struck me as mystifying and sad.

EstelleFebruary 26, 2025

It's very foolish. But that's likely how she's trained herself to think and speak for the last several years. Still, she's speaking out about a dangerous bill that will only harm women and she's not taken a detour into claiming that TIMs will somehow be the real victims. What I do is mentally replace her language with the correct terms and keep reading, focusing on the core of the issue.

[Deleted]February 25, 2025