57
DiscussionTRA = MRA
When I was growing up, I was very much a tomboy and liked typical boys stuff. Around 12 years old when my boobs came in, I realized being a girl sucked in our society. I wished I was a boy, not because I actually wanted to be a boy but because I was now sexualized pretty much everywhere I went, even groped by strange men starting at 10. Boys had so much more agency and their bodies weren't constantly sexualized. They had support to do what they dreamed of and were encouraged to try new things.
Had I grown up under TRA ideology, they would've pushed me to be trans. When all I needed was support and acceptance to be a girl in our society which is what feminism gave me. Now TRA are trying to demonize feminism and retool it to focus on biological males. I really believe TRA are "woke" MRA.
What is with this obsession with categories
If there's no sparkly label to slap on themselves, how will they know how to market themselves? How will they coach others in how to perceive them?
Wow. It's genuinely 100% a fetish 🤢
Jesus Christ. I'm a gay man but I've never wasted any energy thinking about which body type category I'd fall into. And I bet most gay men would say the same for them.
That's good to hear. Honestly, i've been pissed when other women try to label me as butch or femme. Though, the these ones seem a lot more based on body type.
Well she got the "self indulgent" part right!
Translation: I used to be a thin woman, then I took male hormones and am now a thicc hairy woman. I’ll never be seen as a strong man, a hairy man, or any other type of man. I’m sad about it, I’ll never fit in with men because I’m not one. Lie to me please.
These extremely stupid categories people come up with never stop pissing me off.
Those have been there before the trans craze. It just refers to body type and body hair for gay men, for a TIF it's something else though
That’s still annoying.
It's just for people to talk about what they find attractive in a short and simple way
Labels can be used to find people who are you like you and help build relationships. They're inevitable because that's just how language works. It becomes a problem with try hards or women like this.
No, it dehumanizes people and over simplifies our sexuality. It also leaves young people crying about not fitting into a porn category.
This kind of thinking led to trans people claiming to be of another sex (partially). It’s not enough to say you’re a feminine man. You’re a girl. It’s not enough to say you like butch lesbians, you must like transmascs.
“Why don’t I fit into a stereotypical category of gay men like the ones I fetishize?” This woman is close to a real self-revelation, but it won’t happen so long as she goes back to the cult to be reassured that reality doesn’t matter. She doesn’t fit in with gay men because she’s a straight woman. It boggles my mind when I see this posts like this. It’s like all the pieces of the reality puzzle are there in the TiPs hands, but they refuse to put them together.
Ok. Now imagine if this was a regular woman complaining she's not attractive enough to be a sexpot, bombshell, bimbo, or babe.
She's stuck between a plain Jane and tomboy.
It's weird to be hyper focused on these truthfully abstract labels.
"Will I one day be gay enough ..."
This is so funny to me considering she's just talking about being heterosexual "enough".
Ok but what are the chances her “man” is actually another TIF….